When fixing the PR, I failed to remove the comment that raised the
very concern that the PR confirmed, and that the earlier patch for the
PR fixed.
for gcc/ChangeLog
PR target/112778
* builtins.cc (try_store_by_multiple_pieces): Drop obsolete
comment.
if (max_len >> max_bits > min_len >> max_bits)
tst_bits = max_bits;
}
- /* ??? Do we have to check that all powers of two lengths from
- max_bits down to ctz_len pass can_store_by_pieces? As in, could
- it possibly be that xlenest passes while smaller power-of-two
- sizes don't? */
by_pieces_constfn constfun;
void *constfundata;