This patch would like to avoid the ICE when template lambdas call with
default parameters in unevaluated context. The bug is the same as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119385. For example:
1 | template <class T>
2 | void foo(T x) {
3 | sizeof []<int=0>(T=x) { return 0; }();
4 | }
5 |
6 | void test {
7 | foo(0);
8 | }
when compile with -fsyntax-only -std=c++20, it will have ICE similar to
test.cc: In instantiation of 'void foo(T) [with T = int]':
test.cc:7:6: required from here
6 | foo(0);
| ~~~^~~
test.cc:3:38: internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21919
2 | sizeof []<int=0>(T=x) { return 0; }();
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
And if without the template code `<int=0>`, the code will pass compile, it's
wrong.
When parsing lambda, the sizeof will affect the lambda internal unevaluated
operand being handled. So consider save/restore cp_unevaluated_operand.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.cc (cp_parser_lambda_expression): Use cp_evaluated.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval25.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
parser->auto_is_implicit_function_template_parm_p = false;
parser->omp_array_section_p = false;
+ /* Inside the lambda, outside unevaluated context do not apply. */
+ cp_evaluated ev;
+
/* The body of a lambda in a discarded statement is not discarded. */
bool discarded = in_discarded_stmt;
in_discarded_stmt = 0;
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template <class T>
+void foo(T x) {
+ sizeof []<int=0>(T=x) { return 0; }(); // { dg-error "may not appear" }
+ sizeof [](T=x) { return 0; }(); // { dg-error "may not appear" }
+};
+
+void test() {
+ foo(0);
+}