net-stmmac-dwmac4-5-clear-unused-address-entries.patch
qed-set-the-doorbell-address-correctly.patch
signal-pid_namespace-fix-reboot_pid_ns-to-use-send_s.patch
-signal-cifs-fix-cifs_put_tcp_session-to-call-send_si.patch
af_key-fix-leaks-in-key_pol_get_resp-and-dump_sp.patch
xfrm-fix-xfrm-sel-prefix-length-validation.patch
fscrypt-clean-up-some-bug_on-s-in-block-encryption-d.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From 66e63b3845525d8fb86f792db93081ef5112fb17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:33:50 -0500
-Subject: signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of
- force_sig
-
-[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]
-
-The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
-exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem
-in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
-exceptions.
-
-Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
-signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
-delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
-not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
-delivered.
-
-So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
-and pointless.
-
-Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
-using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.
-
-Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
-Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
-Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-index 33cd844579ae..ebc5714fea95 100644
---- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
-+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-@@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ cifs_put_tcp_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int from_reconnect)
-
- task = xchg(&server->tsk, NULL);
- if (task)
-- force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
-+ send_sig(SIGKILL, task, 1);
- }
-
- static struct TCP_Server_Info *
---
-2.20.1
-
net-stmmac-dwmac4-5-clear-unused-address-entries.patch
qed-set-the-doorbell-address-correctly.patch
signal-pid_namespace-fix-reboot_pid_ns-to-use-send_s.patch
-signal-cifs-fix-cifs_put_tcp_session-to-call-send_si.patch
af_key-fix-leaks-in-key_pol_get_resp-and-dump_sp.patch
xfrm-fix-xfrm-sel-prefix-length-validation.patch
fscrypt-clean-up-some-bug_on-s-in-block-encryption-d.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From be4ea26fa58b1a1b0d8ff750d0f40645c444b890 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:33:50 -0500
-Subject: signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of
- force_sig
-
-[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]
-
-The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
-exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem
-in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
-exceptions.
-
-Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
-signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
-delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
-not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
-delivered.
-
-So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
-and pointless.
-
-Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
-using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.
-
-Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
-Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
-Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-index f31339db45fd..82b3af47bce3 100644
---- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
-+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-@@ -2428,7 +2428,7 @@ cifs_put_tcp_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int from_reconnect)
-
- task = xchg(&server->tsk, NULL);
- if (task)
-- force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
-+ send_sig(SIGKILL, task, 1);
- }
-
- static struct TCP_Server_Info *
---
-2.20.1
-
media-vpss-fix-a-potential-null-pointer-dereference.patch
net-stmmac-dwmac1000-clear-unused-address-entries.patch
signal-pid_namespace-fix-reboot_pid_ns-to-use-send_s.patch
-signal-cifs-fix-cifs_put_tcp_session-to-call-send_si.patch
af_key-fix-leaks-in-key_pol_get_resp-and-dump_sp.patch
xfrm-fix-xfrm-sel-prefix-length-validation.patch
media-staging-media-davinci_vpfe-fix-for-memory-leak.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From ec86d93ce747ccb2c5ed3b4c2017abb3edafcbc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:33:50 -0500
-Subject: signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of
- force_sig
-
-[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]
-
-The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
-exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem
-in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
-exceptions.
-
-Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
-signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
-delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
-not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
-delivered.
-
-So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
-and pointless.
-
-Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
-using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.
-
-Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
-Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
-Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-index 9cb72fd40eff..bc7c287a2e17 100644
---- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
-+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-@@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ cifs_put_tcp_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int from_reconnect)
-
- task = xchg(&server->tsk, NULL);
- if (task)
-- force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
-+ send_sig(SIGKILL, task, 1);
- }
-
- static struct TCP_Server_Info *
---
-2.20.1
-
net-stmmac-dwmac1000-clear-unused-address-entries.patch
net-stmmac-dwmac4-5-clear-unused-address-entries.patch
signal-pid_namespace-fix-reboot_pid_ns-to-use-send_s.patch
-signal-cifs-fix-cifs_put_tcp_session-to-call-send_si.patch
af_key-fix-leaks-in-key_pol_get_resp-and-dump_sp.patch
xfrm-fix-xfrm-sel-prefix-length-validation.patch
media-mc-device.c-don-t-memset-__user-pointer-conten.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From 6b774dc4e8d1e50db4a4c639b79c6f337f244728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:33:50 -0500
-Subject: signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of
- force_sig
-
-[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]
-
-The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
-exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem
-in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
-exceptions.
-
-Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
-signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
-delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
-not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
-delivered.
-
-So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
-and pointless.
-
-Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
-using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.
-
-Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
-Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
-Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-index f291ed0c155d..d1019cbf7a52 100644
---- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
-+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-@@ -2221,7 +2221,7 @@ cifs_put_tcp_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int from_reconnect)
-
- task = xchg(&server->tsk, NULL);
- if (task)
-- force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
-+ send_sig(SIGKILL, task, 1);
- }
-
- static struct TCP_Server_Info *
---
-2.20.1
-
net-hns3-initialize-cpu-reverse-mapping.patch
qed-set-the-doorbell-address-correctly.patch
signal-pid_namespace-fix-reboot_pid_ns-to-use-send_s.patch
-signal-cifs-fix-cifs_put_tcp_session-to-call-send_si.patch
af_key-fix-leaks-in-key_pol_get_resp-and-dump_sp.patch
xfrm-fix-xfrm-sel-prefix-length-validation.patch
media-vim2m-fix-two-double-free-issues.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From ed1468091c28abd7d8f31f81259dcf08fa8f8497 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:33:50 -0500
-Subject: signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of
- force_sig
-
-[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]
-
-The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
-exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem
-in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
-exceptions.
-
-Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
-signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
-delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
-not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
-delivered.
-
-So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
-and pointless.
-
-Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
-using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.
-
-Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
-Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
-Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-index e9507fba0b36..10851bb74253 100644
---- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
-+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-@@ -2625,7 +2625,7 @@ cifs_put_tcp_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int from_reconnect)
-
- task = xchg(&server->tsk, NULL);
- if (task)
-- force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
-+ send_sig(SIGKILL, task, 1);
- }
-
- static struct TCP_Server_Info *
---
-2.20.1
-
net-hns3-fix-for-fec-configuration.patch
qed-set-the-doorbell-address-correctly.patch
signal-pid_namespace-fix-reboot_pid_ns-to-use-send_s.patch
-signal-cifs-fix-cifs_put_tcp_session-to-call-send_si.patch
af_key-fix-leaks-in-key_pol_get_resp-and-dump_sp.patch
xfrm-fix-xfrm-sel-prefix-length-validation.patch
media-vim2m-fix-two-double-free-issues.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From 3db07012788baaf57549ce57cfb81871d1d9fd22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:33:50 -0500
-Subject: signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of
- force_sig
-
-[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]
-
-The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
-exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem
-in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
-exceptions.
-
-Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
-signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
-delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
-not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
-delivered.
-
-So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
-and pointless.
-
-Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
-using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.
-
-Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
-Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
-Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-index 8dd6637a3cbb..714a359c7c8d 100644
---- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
-+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
-@@ -2631,7 +2631,7 @@ cifs_put_tcp_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int from_reconnect)
-
- task = xchg(&server->tsk, NULL);
- if (task)
-- force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
-+ send_sig(SIGKILL, task, 1);
- }
-
- static struct TCP_Server_Info *
---
-2.20.1
-
projects / thirdparty / kernel / stable-queue.git / commitdiff
