There are only two callers of thermal_zone_device_is_enabled()
and one of them call is under the zone lock and the other one uses
lockdep_assert_held() on that lock. Thus the lockdep_assert_held()
in thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() is redundant and it could be
dropped, but then the function would merely become a wrapper around
a simple tz->mode check that is more convenient to do directly.
Accordingly, drop thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() altogether and update
its callers to check tz->mode directly as appropriate.
While at it, combine the tz->mode and tz->suspended checks in
__thermal_zone_device_update() because they are of a similar category
and if any of them evaluates to "true", the outcome is the same.
No intentinal functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/9353673.CDJkKcVGEf@rjwysocki.net
int low = -INT_MAX, high = INT_MAX;
int temp, ret;
- if (tz->suspended)
- return;
-
- if (!thermal_zone_device_is_enabled(tz))
+ if (tz->suspended || tz->mode != THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED)
return;
ret = __thermal_zone_get_temp(tz, &temp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_device_disable);
-int thermal_zone_device_is_enabled(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
-{
- lockdep_assert_held(&tz->lock);
-
- return tz->mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED;
-}
-
static bool thermal_zone_is_present(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
{
return !list_empty(&tz->node);
unsigned long new_state) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_THERMAL_STATISTICS */
-/* device tree support */
-int thermal_zone_device_is_enabled(struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
-
#endif /* __THERMAL_CORE_H__ */
int enabled;
mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
- enabled = thermal_zone_device_is_enabled(tz);
+ enabled = tz->mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED;
mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled");