int *is_a_field_of_this,
struct symtab **symtab);
+static struct symbol *lookup_symbol_aux_local (const char *name,
+ const char *mangled_name,
+ const struct block *block,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ struct symtab **symtab);
+
+static
+struct symbol *lookup_symbol_aux_symtabs (int block_index,
+ const char *name,
+ const char *mangled_name,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ struct symtab **symtab);
+
+static
+struct symbol *lookup_symbol_aux_psymtabs (int block_index,
+ const char *name,
+ const char *mangled_name,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ struct symtab **symtab);
+static
+struct symbol *lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (const char *name,
+ const char *mangled_name,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ int *is_a_field_of_this,
+ struct symtab **symtab);
+
static struct symbol *find_active_alias (struct symbol *sym, CORE_ADDR addr);
const struct block *block, const namespace_enum namespace,
int *is_a_field_of_this, struct symtab **symtab)
{
- register struct symbol *sym;
- register struct symtab *s = NULL;
- register struct partial_symtab *ps;
- register struct blockvector *bv;
- register struct objfile *objfile = NULL;
- register struct block *b;
- register struct minimal_symbol *msymbol;
-
+ struct symbol *sym;
/* Search specified block and its superiors. */
- while (block != 0)
- {
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
- if (sym)
- {
- block_found = block;
- if (symtab != NULL)
- {
- /* Search the list of symtabs for one which contains the
- address of the start of this block. */
- ALL_SYMTABS (objfile, s)
- {
- bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
- b = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);
- if (BLOCK_START (b) <= BLOCK_START (block)
- && BLOCK_END (b) > BLOCK_START (block))
- goto found;
- }
- found:
- *symtab = s;
- }
-
- return fixup_symbol_section (sym, objfile);
- }
- block = BLOCK_SUPERBLOCK (block);
- }
-
- /* FIXME: this code is never executed--block is always NULL at this
- point. What is it trying to do, anyway? We already should have
- checked the STATIC_BLOCK above (it is the superblock of top-level
- blocks). Why is VAR_NAMESPACE special-cased? */
- /* Don't need to mess with the psymtabs; if we have a block,
- that file is read in. If we don't, then we deal later with
- all the psymtab stuff that needs checking. */
- /* Note (RT): The following never-executed code looks unnecessary to me also.
- * If we change the code to use the original (passed-in)
- * value of 'block', we could cause it to execute, but then what
- * would it do? The STATIC_BLOCK of the symtab containing the passed-in
- * 'block' was already searched by the above code. And the STATIC_BLOCK's
- * of *other* symtabs (those files not containing 'block' lexically)
- * should not contain 'block' address-wise. So we wouldn't expect this
- * code to find any 'sym''s that were not found above. I vote for
- * deleting the following paragraph of code.
- */
- if (namespace == VAR_NAMESPACE && block != NULL)
- {
- struct block *b;
- /* Find the right symtab. */
- ALL_SYMTABS (objfile, s)
- {
- bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
- b = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK);
- if (BLOCK_START (b) <= BLOCK_START (block)
- && BLOCK_END (b) > BLOCK_START (block))
- {
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (b, name, mangled_name, VAR_NAMESPACE);
- if (sym)
- {
- block_found = b;
- if (symtab != NULL)
- *symtab = s;
- return fixup_symbol_section (sym, objfile);
- }
- }
- }
- }
-
+ sym = lookup_symbol_aux_local (name, mangled_name, block, namespace,
+ symtab);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ return sym;
/* C++: If requested to do so by the caller,
check to see if NAME is a field of `this'. */
of the desired name as a global, then do psymtab-to-symtab
conversion on the fly and return the found symbol. */
- ALL_SYMTABS (objfile, s)
- {
- bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
- if (sym)
- {
- block_found = block;
- if (symtab != NULL)
- *symtab = s;
- return fixup_symbol_section (sym, objfile);
- }
- }
+ sym = lookup_symbol_aux_symtabs (GLOBAL_BLOCK, name, mangled_name,
+ namespace, symtab);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ return sym;
+
+ sym = lookup_symbol_aux_psymtabs (GLOBAL_BLOCK, name, mangled_name,
+ namespace, symtab);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ return sym;
#ifndef HPUXHPPA
- /* Check for the possibility of the symbol being a function or
- a mangled variable that is stored in one of the minimal symbol tables.
- Eventually, all global symbols might be resolved in this way. */
+ /* Check for the possibility of the symbol being a function or a
+ mangled variable that is stored in one of the minimal symbol
+ tables. Eventually, all global symbols might be resolved in this
+ way. */
- if (namespace == VAR_NAMESPACE)
- {
- msymbol = lookup_minimal_symbol (name, NULL, NULL);
- if (msymbol != NULL)
- {
- s = find_pc_sect_symtab (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol),
- SYMBOL_BFD_SECTION (msymbol));
- if (s != NULL)
- {
- /* This is a function which has a symtab for its address. */
- bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);
+ sym = lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (name, mangled_name,
+ namespace, is_a_field_of_this,
+ symtab);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ return sym;
- /* This call used to pass `SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)' as the
- `name' argument to lookup_block_symbol. But the name
- of a minimal symbol is always mangled, so that seems
- to be clearly the wrong thing to pass as the
- unmangled name. */
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
- /* We kept static functions in minimal symbol table as well as
- in static scope. We want to find them in the symbol table. */
- if (!sym)
- {
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK);
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name,
- mangled_name, namespace);
- }
+#endif
- /* sym == 0 if symbol was found in the minimal symbol table
- but not in the symtab.
- Return 0 to use the msymbol definition of "foo_".
+ /* Now search all static file-level symbols. Not strictly correct,
+ but more useful than an error. Do the symtabs first, then check
+ the psymtabs. If a psymtab indicates the existence of the
+ desired name as a file-level static, then do psymtab-to-symtab
+ conversion on the fly and return the found symbol. */
- This happens for Fortran "foo_" symbols,
- which are "foo" in the symtab.
+ sym = lookup_symbol_aux_symtabs (STATIC_BLOCK, name, mangled_name,
+ namespace, symtab);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ return sym;
+
+ sym = lookup_symbol_aux_psymtabs (STATIC_BLOCK, name, mangled_name,
+ namespace, symtab);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ return sym;
- This can also happen if "asm" is used to make a
- regular symbol but not a debugging symbol, e.g.
- asm(".globl _main");
- asm("_main:");
- */
- if (symtab != NULL)
- *symtab = s;
- return fixup_symbol_section (sym, objfile);
- }
- else if (MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_text
- && MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_file_text
- && !STREQ (name, SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)))
+#ifdef HPUXHPPA
+
+ /* Check for the possibility of the symbol being a function or a
+ global variable that is stored in one of the minimal symbol
+ tables. The "minimal symbol table" is built from linker-supplied
+ info.
+
+ RT: I moved this check to last, after the complete search of the
+ global (p)symtab's and static (p)symtab's. For HP-generated
+ symbol tables, this check was causing a premature exit from
+ lookup_symbol with NULL return, and thus messing up symbol
+ lookups of things like "c::f". It seems to me a check of the
+ minimal symbol table ought to be a last resort in any case. I'm
+ vaguely worried about the comment within
+ lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms which talks about FORTRAN routines
+ "foo_" though... is it saying we need to do the "minsym" check
+ before the static check in this case? */
+
+ sym = lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (name, mangled_name,
+ namespace, is_a_field_of_this,
+ symtab);
+ if (sym != NULL)
+ return sym;
+
+#endif
+
+ if (symtab != NULL)
+ *symtab = NULL;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Check to see if the symbol is defined in BLOCK or its
+ superiors. */
+
+static struct symbol *
+lookup_symbol_aux_local (const char *name, const char *mangled_name,
+ const struct block *block,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ struct symtab **symtab)
+{
+ struct symbol *sym;
+ struct objfile *objfile = NULL;
+ struct blockvector *bv;
+ struct block *b;
+ struct symtab *s = NULL;
+
+ while (block != 0)
+ {
+ sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
+ if (sym)
+ {
+ block_found = block;
+ if (symtab != NULL)
{
- /* This is a mangled variable, look it up by its
- mangled name. */
- return lookup_symbol_aux (SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol), mangled_name, block,
- namespace, is_a_field_of_this, symtab);
+ /* Search the list of symtabs for one which contains the
+ address of the start of this block. */
+ ALL_SYMTABS (objfile, s)
+ {
+ bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
+ b = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);
+ if (BLOCK_START (b) <= BLOCK_START (block)
+ && BLOCK_END (b) > BLOCK_START (block))
+ goto found;
+ }
+ found:
+ *symtab = s;
}
- /* There are no debug symbols for this file, or we are looking
- for an unmangled variable.
- Try to find a matching static symbol below. */
+
+ return fixup_symbol_section (sym, objfile);
}
+ block = BLOCK_SUPERBLOCK (block);
}
-#endif
+ return NULL;
+}
- ALL_PSYMTABS (objfile, ps)
- {
- if (!ps->readin && lookup_partial_symbol (ps, name, 1, namespace))
- {
- s = PSYMTAB_TO_SYMTAB (ps);
- bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
- if (!sym)
- {
- /* This shouldn't be necessary, but as a last resort
- * try looking in the statics even though the psymtab
- * claimed the symbol was global. It's possible that
- * the psymtab gets it wrong in some cases.
- */
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK);
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
- if (!sym)
- error ("Internal: global symbol `%s' found in %s psymtab but not in symtab.\n\
-%s may be an inlined function, or may be a template function\n\
-(if a template, try specifying an instantiation: %s<type>).",
- name, ps->filename, name, name);
- }
- if (symtab != NULL)
- *symtab = s;
- return fixup_symbol_section (sym, objfile);
- }
- }
+/* Check to see if the symbol is defined in one of the symtabs.
+ BLOCK_INDEX should be either GLOBAL_BLOCK or STATIC_BLOCK,
+ depending on whether or not we want to search global symbols or
+ static symbols. */
- /* Now search all static file-level symbols.
- Not strictly correct, but more useful than an error.
- Do the symtabs first, then check the psymtabs.
- If a psymtab indicates the existence
- of the desired name as a file-level static, then do psymtab-to-symtab
- conversion on the fly and return the found symbol. */
+static struct symbol *
+lookup_symbol_aux_symtabs (int block_index,
+ const char *name, const char *mangled_name,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ struct symtab **symtab)
+{
+ struct symbol *sym;
+ struct objfile *objfile;
+ struct blockvector *bv;
+ const struct block *block;
+ struct symtab *s;
ALL_SYMTABS (objfile, s)
{
bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK);
+ block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, block_index);
sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
if (sym)
{
}
}
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Check to see if the symbol is defined in one of the partial
+ symtabs. BLOCK_INDEX should be either GLOBAL_BLOCK or
+ STATIC_BLOCK, depending on whether or not we want to search global
+ symbols or static symbols. */
+
+static struct symbol *
+lookup_symbol_aux_psymtabs (int block_index, const char *name,
+ const char *mangled_name,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ struct symtab **symtab)
+{
+ struct symbol *sym;
+ struct objfile *objfile;
+ struct blockvector *bv;
+ const struct block *block;
+ struct partial_symtab *ps;
+ struct symtab *s;
+ const int psymtab_index = (block_index == GLOBAL_BLOCK ? 1 : 0);
+
ALL_PSYMTABS (objfile, ps)
{
- if (!ps->readin && lookup_partial_symbol (ps, name, 0, namespace))
+ if (!ps->readin
+ && lookup_partial_symbol (ps, name, psymtab_index, namespace))
{
s = PSYMTAB_TO_SYMTAB (ps);
bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK);
+ block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, block_index);
sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
if (!sym)
{
- /* This shouldn't be necessary, but as a last resort
- * try looking in the globals even though the psymtab
- * claimed the symbol was static. It's possible that
- * the psymtab gets it wrong in some cases.
- */
- block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);
+ /* This shouldn't be necessary, but as a last resort try
+ looking in the statics even though the psymtab claimed
+ the symbol was global, or vice-versa. It's possible
+ that the psymtab gets it wrong in some cases. */
+
+ /* FIXME: carlton/2002-09-30: Should we really do that?
+ If that happens, isn't it likely to be a GDB error, in
+ which case we should fix the GDB error rather than
+ silently dealing with it here? So I'd vote for
+ removing the check for the symbol in the other
+ block. */
+ block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv,
+ block_index == GLOBAL_BLOCK ?
+ STATIC_BLOCK : GLOBAL_BLOCK);
sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
if (!sym)
- error ("Internal: static symbol `%s' found in %s psymtab but not in symtab.\n\
-%s may be an inlined function, or may be a template function\n\
-(if a template, try specifying an instantiation: %s<type>).",
+ error ("Internal: %s symbol `%s' found in %s psymtab but not in symtab.\n%s may be an inlined function, or may be a template function\n(if a template, try specifying an instantiation: %s<type>).",
+ block_index == GLOBAL_BLOCK ? "global" : "static",
name, ps->filename, name, name);
}
if (symtab != NULL)
}
}
-#ifdef HPUXHPPA
+ return NULL;
+}
- /* Check for the possibility of the symbol being a function or
- a global variable that is stored in one of the minimal symbol tables.
- The "minimal symbol table" is built from linker-supplied info.
+/* Check for the possibility of the symbol being a function or a
+ mangled variable that is stored in one of the minimal symbol
+ tables. Eventually, all global symbols might be resolved in this
+ way. */
- RT: I moved this check to last, after the complete search of
- the global (p)symtab's and static (p)symtab's. For HP-generated
- symbol tables, this check was causing a premature exit from
- lookup_symbol with NULL return, and thus messing up symbol lookups
- of things like "c::f". It seems to me a check of the minimal
- symbol table ought to be a last resort in any case. I'm vaguely
- worried about the comment below which talks about FORTRAN routines "foo_"
- though... is it saying we need to do the "minsym" check before
- the static check in this case?
- */
+static struct symbol *
+lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms (const char *name,
+ const char *mangled_name,
+ const namespace_enum namespace,
+ int *is_a_field_of_this,
+ struct symtab **symtab)
+{
+ struct symbol *sym;
+ struct blockvector *bv;
+ const struct block *block;
+ struct minimal_symbol *msymbol;
+ struct symtab *s;
if (namespace == VAR_NAMESPACE)
{
msymbol = lookup_minimal_symbol (name, NULL, NULL);
if (msymbol != NULL)
{
- /* OK, we found a minimal symbol in spite of not
- * finding any symbol. There are various possible
- * explanations for this. One possibility is the symbol
- * exists in code not compiled -g. Another possibility
- * is that the 'psymtab' isn't doing its job.
- * A third possibility, related to #2, is that we were confused
- * by name-mangling. For instance, maybe the psymtab isn't
- * doing its job because it only know about demangled
- * names, but we were given a mangled name...
- */
-
- /* We first use the address in the msymbol to try to
- * locate the appropriate symtab. Note that find_pc_symtab()
- * has a side-effect of doing psymtab-to-symtab expansion,
- * for the found symtab.
- */
- s = find_pc_symtab (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol));
+ /* OK, we found a minimal symbol in spite of not finding any
+ symbol. There are various possible explanations for
+ this. One possibility is the symbol exists in code not
+ compiled -g. Another possibility is that the 'psymtab'
+ isn't doing its job. A third possibility, related to #2,
+ is that we were confused by name-mangling. For instance,
+ maybe the psymtab isn't doing its job because it only
+ know about demangled names, but we were given a mangled
+ name... */
+
+ /* We first use the address in the msymbol to try to locate
+ the appropriate symtab. Note that find_pc_sect_symtab()
+ has a side-effect of doing psymtab-to-symtab expansion,
+ for the found symtab. */
+ s = find_pc_sect_symtab (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol),
+ SYMBOL_BFD_SECTION (msymbol));
if (s != NULL)
{
+ /* This is a function which has a symtab for its address. */
bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);
- /* This call used to pass `SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)' as the
- `name' argument to lookup_block_symbol. But the name
- of a minimal symbol is always mangled, so that seems
- to be clearly the wrong thing to pass as the
- unmangled name. */
- sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
+
+ /* This call used to pass `SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)' as the
+ `name' argument to lookup_block_symbol. But the name
+ of a minimal symbol is always mangled, so that seems
+ to be clearly the wrong thing to pass as the
+ unmangled name. */
+ sym =
+ lookup_block_symbol (block, name, mangled_name, namespace);
/* We kept static functions in minimal symbol table as well as
in static scope. We want to find them in the symbol table. */
if (!sym)
{
block = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK);
sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name,
- mangled_name, namespace);
- }
- /* If we found one, return it */
- if (sym)
- {
- if (symtab != NULL)
- *symtab = s;
- return sym;
+ mangled_name, namespace);
}
- /* If we get here with sym == 0, the symbol was
- found in the minimal symbol table
+ /* sym == 0 if symbol was found in the minimal symbol table
but not in the symtab.
- Fall through and return 0 to use the msymbol
- definition of "foo_".
- (Note that outer code generally follows up a call
- to this routine with a call to lookup_minimal_symbol(),
- so a 0 return means we'll just flow into that other routine).
+ Return 0 to use the msymbol definition of "foo_".
This happens for Fortran "foo_" symbols,
which are "foo" in the symtab.
asm(".globl _main");
asm("_main:");
*/
- }
- /* If the lookup-by-address fails, try repeating the
- * entire lookup process with the symbol name from
- * the msymbol (if different from the original symbol name).
- */
+ if (symtab != NULL)
+ *symtab = s;
+ return fixup_symbol_section (sym, s->objfile);
+ }
else if (MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_text
&& MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) != mst_file_text
&& !STREQ (name, SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol)))
{
+ /* This is a mangled variable, look it up by its
+ mangled name. */
return lookup_symbol_aux (SYMBOL_NAME (msymbol), mangled_name,
- block, namespace, is_a_field_of_this,
+ NULL, namespace, is_a_field_of_this,
symtab);
}
}
}
-#endif
-
- if (symtab != NULL)
- *symtab = NULL;
- return 0;
+ return NULL;
}
/* Look, in partial_symtab PST, for symbol NAME. Check the global
const char *mangled_name,
const namespace_enum namespace)
{
- register int bot, top, inc;
+ register int bot, top;
register struct symbol *sym;
register struct symbol *sym_found = NULL;
- register int do_linear_search = 1;
if (BLOCK_HASHTABLE (block))
{
}
return NULL;
}
-
- /* If the blocks's symbols were sorted, start with a binary search. */
-
- if (BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT (block))
- {
- /* Reset the linear search flag so if the binary search fails, we
- won't do the linear search once unless we find some reason to
- do so */
-
- do_linear_search = 0;
- top = BLOCK_NSYMS (block);
- bot = 0;
-
- /* Advance BOT to not far before the first symbol whose name is NAME. */
-
- while (1)
- {
- inc = (top - bot + 1);
- /* No need to keep binary searching for the last few bits worth. */
- if (inc < 4)
- {
- break;
- }
- inc = (inc >> 1) + bot;
- sym = BLOCK_SYM (block, inc);
- if (!do_linear_search && (SYMBOL_LANGUAGE (sym) == language_java))
- {
- do_linear_search = 1;
- }
- if (SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (sym)[0] < name[0])
- {
- bot = inc;
- }
- else if (SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (sym)[0] > name[0])
- {
- top = inc;
- }
- else if (strcmp (SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (sym), name) < 0)
- {
- bot = inc;
- }
- else
- {
- top = inc;
- }
- }
-
- /* Now scan forward until we run out of symbols, find one whose
- name is greater than NAME, or find one we want. If there is
- more than one symbol with the right name and namespace, we
- return the first one; I believe it is now impossible for us
- to encounter two symbols with the same name and namespace
- here, because blocks containing argument symbols are no
- longer sorted. The exception is for C++, where multiple functions
- (cloned constructors / destructors, in particular) can have
- the same demangled name. So if we have a particular
- mangled name to match, try to do so. */
-
- top = BLOCK_NSYMS (block);
- while (bot < top)
- {
- sym = BLOCK_SYM (block, bot);
- if (SYMBOL_NAMESPACE (sym) == namespace
- && (mangled_name
- ? strcmp (SYMBOL_NAME (sym), mangled_name) == 0
- : SYMBOL_MATCHES_NAME (sym, name)))
- {
- return sym;
- }
- if (SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (sym)[0] > name[0])
- {
- break;
- }
- bot++;
- }
- }
-
- /* Here if block isn't sorted, or we fail to find a match during the
- binary search above. If during the binary search above, we find a
- symbol which is a Java symbol, then we have re-enabled the linear
- search flag which was reset when starting the binary search.
-
- This loop is equivalent to the loop above, but hacked greatly for speed.
-
- Note that parameter symbols do not always show up last in the
- list; this loop makes sure to take anything else other than
- parameter symbols first; it only uses parameter symbols as a
- last resort. Note that this only takes up extra computation
- time on a match. */
-
- if (do_linear_search)
+ else
{
+ /* Note that parameter symbols do not always show up last in the
+ list. This loop makes sure to take anything else other than
+ parameter symbols first; it only uses parameter symbols as a
+ last resort. Note that this only takes up extra computation
+ time on a match. */
top = BLOCK_NSYMS (block);
bot = 0;
while (bot < top)
{
sym = BLOCK_SYM (block, bot);
+ /* If there is more than one symbol with the right name and
+ namespace, we return the first one; I believe it is now
+ impossible for us to encounter two symbols with the same
+ name and namespace here, because blocks containing
+ argument symbols are no longer sorted. The exception is
+ for C++, where multiple functions (cloned constructors /
+ destructors, in particular) can have the same demangled
+ name. So if we have a particular mangled name to match,
+ try to do so. */
if (SYMBOL_NAMESPACE (sym) == namespace
&& (mangled_name
? strcmp (SYMBOL_NAME (sym), mangled_name) == 0
}
bot++;
}
+ return (sym_found); /* Will be NULL if not found. */
}
- return (sym_found); /* Will be NULL if not found. */
}
/* Given a main symbol SYM and ADDR, search through the alias
projects / thirdparty / binutils-gdb.git / commitdiff
