Fix inconsistency in comments atop ExecParallelEstimate.

When this code was initially introduced in commit d1b7c1ff, the structure
used was SharedPlanStateInstrumentation, but later when it got changed to
Instrumentation structure in commit b287df70, we forgot to update the
comment.

Reported-by: Wu Fei
Author: Wu Fei
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/52E6E0843B9D774C8C73D6CF64402F0562215EB2@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
index b1a3d91a1969045fb58f4ef407cb1a1897849964..47724080c9e2e95291332b1d73136237d2da1f65 100644 (file)
--- a/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execParallel.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ ExecSerializePlan(Plan *plan, EState *estate)
  * shm_toc_estimate_keys on &pcxt->estimator.
  *
  * While we're at it, count the number of PlanState nodes in the tree, so
- * we know how many SharedPlanStateInstrumentation structures we need.
+ * we know how many Instrumentation structures we need.
  */
 static bool
 ExecParallelEstimate(PlanState *planstate, ExecParallelEstimateContext *e)