--- /dev/null
+From a078dff870136090b5779ca2831870a6c5539d36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:09:29 +0200
+Subject: ext4: fixup possible uninitialized variable access in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1()
+
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+
+commit a078dff870136090b5779ca2831870a6c5539d36 upstream.
+
+Variable 'grp' may be left uninitialized if there's no group with
+suitable average fragment size (or larger). Fix the problem by
+initializing it earlier.
+
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220922091542.pkhedytey7wzp5fi@quack3
+Fixes: 83e80a6e3543 ("ext4: use buckets for cr 1 block scan instead of rbtree")
+Cc: stable@kernel.org
+Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
+Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 3 +--
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr
+ int *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
+ {
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
+- struct ext4_group_info *grp, *iter;
++ struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL, *iter;
+ int i;
+
+ if (unlikely(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_CR1_OPTIMIZED)) {
+@@ -927,7 +927,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr
+ read_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[i]);
+ continue;
+ }
+- grp = NULL;
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[i],
+ bb_avg_fragment_size_node) {
+ if (sbi->s_mb_stats)