+2006-12-07 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
+
+ * tree-vrp.c (compare_values): Short circuit INTEGER_CST;
+ use fold_constant_to_binary; tolerate wrong type constants.
+ (value_intersect_p): Do just two tests.
+
2006-12-07 Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com>
* config/bfin/bfin.c (print_operand): New modifier 'N' for constants.
if (operand_less_p (val2, val1) == 1)
return 1;
- /* If VAL1 is different than VAL2, return +2. */
- t = fold_binary (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, val1, val2);
- if (t == boolean_true_node)
- return 2;
+ /* If VAL1 is different than VAL2, return +2.
+ For integer constants we either have already returned -1 or 1
+ or they are equivalent. We still might suceed prove something
+ about non-trivial operands. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (val1) != INTEGER_CST
+ || TREE_CODE (val2) != INTEGER_CST)
+ {
+ t = fold_binary_to_constant (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, val1, val2);
+ if (t && tree_expr_nonzero_p (t))
+ return 2;
+ }
return -2;
}
static inline bool
value_ranges_intersect_p (value_range_t *vr0, value_range_t *vr1)
{
- return (value_inside_range (vr1->min, vr0) == 1
- || value_inside_range (vr1->max, vr0) == 1
- || value_inside_range (vr0->min, vr1) == 1
- || value_inside_range (vr0->max, vr1) == 1);
+ /* The value ranges do not intersect if the maximum of the first range is
+ less than the minimum of the second range or vice versa.
+ When those relations are unknown, we can't do any better. */
+ if (operand_less_p (vr0->max, vr1->min) != 0)
+ return false;
+ if (operand_less_p (vr1->max, vr0->min) != 0)
+ return false;
+ return true;
}