--- /dev/null
+From 619f75dae2cf117b1d07f27b046b9ffb071c4685 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:56:53 +0100
+Subject: ext4: fix warning in ext4_dio_write_end_io()
+
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+
+commit 619f75dae2cf117b1d07f27b046b9ffb071c4685 upstream.
+
+The syzbot has reported that it can hit the warning in
+ext4_dio_write_end_io() because i_size < i_disksize. Indeed the
+reproducer creates a race between DIO IO completion and truncate
+expanding the file and thus ext4_dio_write_end_io() sees an inconsistent
+inode state where i_disksize is already updated but i_size is not
+updated yet. Since we are careful when setting up DIO write and consider
+it extending (and thus performing the IO synchronously with i_rwsem held
+exclusively) whenever it goes past either of i_size or i_disksize, we
+can use the same test during IO completion without risking entering
+ext4_handle_inode_extension() without i_rwsem held. This way we make it
+obvious both i_size and i_disksize are large enough when we report DIO
+completion without relying on unreliable WARN_ON.
+
+Reported-by: <syzbot+47479b71cdfc78f56d30@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
+Fixes: 91562895f803 ("ext4: properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO")
+Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130095653.22679-1-jack@suse.cz
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/ext4/file.c | 14 ++++++++------
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
+@@ -323,9 +323,10 @@ static void ext4_inode_extension_cleanup
+ return;
+ }
+ /*
+- * If i_disksize got extended due to writeback of delalloc blocks while
+- * the DIO was running we could fail to cleanup the orphan list in
+- * ext4_handle_inode_extension(). Do it now.
++ * If i_disksize got extended either due to writeback of delalloc
++ * blocks or extending truncate while the DIO was running we could fail
++ * to cleanup the orphan list in ext4_handle_inode_extension(). Do it
++ * now.
+ */
+ if (!list_empty(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan) && inode->i_nlink) {
+ handle_t *handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, EXT4_HT_INODE, 2);
+@@ -360,10 +361,11 @@ static int ext4_dio_write_end_io(struct
+ * blocks. But the code in ext4_iomap_alloc() is careful to use
+ * zeroed/unwritten extents if this is possible; thus we won't leave
+ * uninitialized blocks in a file even if we didn't succeed in writing
+- * as much as we intended.
++ * as much as we intended. Also we can race with truncate or write
++ * expanding the file so we have to be a bit careful here.
+ */
+- WARN_ON_ONCE(i_size_read(inode) < READ_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize));
+- if (pos + size <= READ_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize))
++ if (pos + size <= READ_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize) &&
++ pos + size <= i_size_read(inode))
+ return size;
+ return ext4_handle_inode_extension(inode, pos, size);
+ }