Same as in
81d7934882ae13c64d9b08d365a0baa011cb2fbb, intmax_t by definition is
the widest int. Strictly speaking, the check whether
sizeof(intmax_t) == sizeof(long long)
in the code below is redundant, but I think it's nicer to keep it for symmetry
with the other cases.
Requested in
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/37442#pullrequestreview-
2840906908.
* otherwise warn about fetching smaller types. */
assert_cc(sizeof(int) == 4);
assert_cc(sizeof(wchar_t) <= sizeof(int));
- assert_cc(sizeof(intmax_t) <= sizeof(long long));
+ assert_cc(sizeof(long long) == sizeof(intmax_t));
assert(ctx);
assert(sp);