--- /dev/null
+From 03b3b889e79cdb6b806fc0ba9be0d71c186bbfaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:45:28 -0400
+Subject: fold d_kill() and d_free()
+
+From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+
+commit 03b3b889e79cdb6b806fc0ba9be0d71c186bbfaa upstream.
+
+Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+
+---
+ fs/dcache.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------
+ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/dcache.c
++++ b/fs/dcache.c
+@@ -244,24 +244,6 @@ static void __d_free(struct rcu_head *he
+ kmem_cache_free(dentry_cache, dentry);
+ }
+
+-/*
+- * no locks, please.
+- */
+-static void d_free(struct dentry *dentry)
+-{
+- WARN_ON(!hlist_unhashed(&dentry->d_u.d_alias));
+- BUG_ON((int)dentry->d_lockref.count > 0);
+- this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry);
+- if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_release)
+- dentry->d_op->d_release(dentry);
+-
+- /* if dentry was never visible to RCU, immediate free is OK */
+- if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_RCUACCESS))
+- __d_free(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu);
+- else
+- call_rcu(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu, __d_free);
+-}
+-
+ /**
+ * dentry_rcuwalk_barrier - invalidate in-progress rcu-walk lookups
+ * @dentry: the target dentry
+@@ -419,40 +401,6 @@ static void dentry_lru_del(struct dentry
+ }
+
+ /**
+- * d_kill - kill dentry and return parent
+- * @dentry: dentry to kill
+- * @parent: parent dentry
+- *
+- * The dentry must already be unhashed and removed from the LRU.
+- *
+- * If this is the root of the dentry tree, return NULL.
+- *
+- * dentry->d_lock and parent->d_lock must be held by caller, and are dropped by
+- * d_kill.
+- */
+-static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
+- __releases(dentry->d_lock)
+- __releases(parent->d_lock)
+- __releases(dentry->d_inode->i_lock)
+-{
+- __list_del_entry(&dentry->d_child);
+- /*
+- * Inform d_walk() that we are no longer attached to the
+- * dentry tree
+- */
+- dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED;
+- if (parent)
+- spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+- dentry_iput(dentry);
+- /*
+- * dentry_iput drops the locks, at which point nobody (except
+- * transient RCU lookups) can reach this dentry.
+- */
+- d_free(dentry);
+- return parent;
+-}
+-
+-/**
+ * d_drop - drop a dentry
+ * @dentry: dentry to drop
+ *
+@@ -545,7 +493,30 @@ relock:
+ dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ /* if it was on the hash then remove it */
+ __d_drop(dentry);
+- return d_kill(dentry, parent);
++ __list_del_entry(&dentry->d_child);
++ /*
++ * Inform d_walk() that we are no longer attached to the
++ * dentry tree
++ */
++ dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED;
++ if (parent)
++ spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
++ dentry_iput(dentry);
++ /*
++ * dentry_iput drops the locks, at which point nobody (except
++ * transient RCU lookups) can reach this dentry.
++ */
++ BUG_ON((int)dentry->d_lockref.count > 0);
++ this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry);
++ if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_release)
++ dentry->d_op->d_release(dentry);
++
++ /* if dentry was never visible to RCU, immediate free is OK */
++ if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_RCUACCESS))
++ __d_free(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu);
++ else
++ call_rcu(&dentry->d_u.d_rcu, __d_free);
++ return parent;
+ }
+
+ /*
pci-restore-pci_msix_flags_birmask-definition.patch
md-raid1-extend-spinlock-to-protect-raid1_end_read_request-against-inconsistencies.patch
sg_start_req-make-sure-that-there-s-not-too-many-elements-in-iovec.patch
+signalfd-fix-information-leak-in-signalfd_copyinfo.patch
+signal-fix-information-leak-in-copy_siginfo_to_user.patch
+signal-fix-information-leak-in-copy_siginfo_from_user32.patch
+fold-d_kill-and-d_free.patch
--- /dev/null
+From 3c00cb5e68dc719f2fc73a33b1b230aadfcb1309 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:46:26 -0700
+Subject: signal: fix information leak in copy_siginfo_from_user32
+
+From: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+
+commit 3c00cb5e68dc719f2fc73a33b1b230aadfcb1309 upstream.
+
+This function can leak kernel stack data when the user siginfo_t has a
+positive si_code value. The top 16 bits of si_code descibe which fields
+in the siginfo_t union are active, but they are treated inconsistently
+between copy_siginfo_from_user32, copy_siginfo_to_user32 and
+copy_siginfo_to_user.
+
+copy_siginfo_from_user32 is called from rt_sigqueueinfo and
+rt_tgsigqueueinfo in which the user has full control overthe top 16 bits
+of si_code.
+
+This fixes the following information leaks:
+x86: 8 bytes leaked when sending a signal from a 32-bit process to
+ itself. This leak grows to 16 bytes if the process uses x32.
+ (si_code = __SI_CHLD)
+x86: 100 bytes leaked when sending a signal from a 32-bit process to
+ a 64-bit process. (si_code = -1)
+sparc: 4 bytes leaked when sending a signal from a 32-bit process to a
+ 64-bit process. (si_code = any)
+
+parsic and s390 have similar bugs, but they are not vulnerable because
+rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo have checks that prevent sending a positive si_code
+to a different process. These bugs are also fixed for consistency.
+
+Signed-off-by: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
+Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
+Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
+Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
+Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
+Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
+Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c | 2 --
+ arch/mips/kernel/signal32.c | 2 --
+ arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 2 --
+ kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
+ 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
++++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
+@@ -193,8 +193,6 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginf
+
+ int copy_siginfo_from_user32(siginfo_t *to, compat_siginfo_t __user *from)
+ {
+- memset(to, 0, sizeof *to);
+-
+ if (copy_from_user(to, from, __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE) ||
+ copy_from_user(to->_sifields._pad,
+ from->_sifields._pad, SI_PAD_SIZE))
+--- a/arch/mips/kernel/signal32.c
++++ b/arch/mips/kernel/signal32.c
+@@ -370,8 +370,6 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginf
+
+ int copy_siginfo_from_user32(siginfo_t *to, compat_siginfo_t __user *from)
+ {
+- memset(to, 0, sizeof *to);
+-
+ if (copy_from_user(to, from, 3*sizeof(int)) ||
+ copy_from_user(to->_sifields._pad,
+ from->_sifields._pad, SI_PAD_SIZE32))
+--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
++++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
+@@ -967,8 +967,6 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat
+
+ int copy_siginfo_from_user32(siginfo_t *to, struct compat_siginfo __user *from)
+ {
+- memset(to, 0, sizeof *to);
+-
+ if (copy_from_user(to, from, 3*sizeof(int)) ||
+ copy_from_user(to->_sifields._pad,
+ from->_sifields._pad, SI_PAD_SIZE32))
+--- a/kernel/signal.c
++++ b/kernel/signal.c
+@@ -3036,7 +3036,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(rt_sigqueueinfo,
+ int, sig,
+ struct compat_siginfo __user *, uinfo)
+ {
+- siginfo_t info;
++ siginfo_t info = {};
+ int ret = copy_siginfo_from_user32(&info, uinfo);
+ if (unlikely(ret))
+ return ret;
+@@ -3082,7 +3082,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(rt_tgsigqueueinfo
+ int, sig,
+ struct compat_siginfo __user *, uinfo)
+ {
+- siginfo_t info;
++ siginfo_t info = {};
+
+ if (copy_siginfo_from_user32(&info, uinfo))
+ return -EFAULT;
--- /dev/null
+From 26135022f85105ad725cda103fa069e29e83bd16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:46:29 -0700
+Subject: signal: fix information leak in copy_siginfo_to_user
+
+From: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+
+commit 26135022f85105ad725cda103fa069e29e83bd16 upstream.
+
+This function may copy the si_addr_lsb, si_lower and si_upper fields to
+user mode when they haven't been initialized, which can leak kernel
+stack data to user mode.
+
+Just checking the value of si_code is insufficient because the same
+si_code value is shared between multiple signals. This is solved by
+checking the value of si_signo in addition to si_code.
+
+Signed-off-by: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
+Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c | 3 ++-
+ kernel/signal.c | 3 ++-
+ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
++++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
+@@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginf
+ * Other callers might not initialize the si_lsb field,
+ * so check explicitely for the right codes here.
+ */
+- if (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)
++ if (from->si_signo == SIGBUS &&
++ (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO))
+ err |= __put_user(from->si_addr_lsb, &to->si_addr_lsb);
+ #endif
+ break;
+--- a/kernel/signal.c
++++ b/kernel/signal.c
+@@ -2768,7 +2768,8 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user(siginfo_t __use
+ * Other callers might not initialize the si_lsb field,
+ * so check explicitly for the right codes here.
+ */
+- if (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)
++ if (from->si_signo == SIGBUS &&
++ (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR || from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO))
+ err |= __put_user(from->si_addr_lsb, &to->si_addr_lsb);
+ #endif
+ break;
--- /dev/null
+From 3ead7c52bdb0ab44f4bb1feed505a8323cc12ba7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:46:33 -0700
+Subject: signalfd: fix information leak in signalfd_copyinfo
+
+From: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+
+commit 3ead7c52bdb0ab44f4bb1feed505a8323cc12ba7 upstream.
+
+This function may copy the si_addr_lsb field to user mode when it hasn't
+been initialized, which can leak kernel stack data to user mode.
+
+Just checking the value of si_code is insufficient because the same
+si_code value is shared between multiple signals. This is solved by
+checking the value of si_signo in addition to si_code.
+
+Signed-off-by: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
+Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ fs/signalfd.c | 5 +++--
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/signalfd.c
++++ b/fs/signalfd.c
+@@ -121,8 +121,9 @@ static int signalfd_copyinfo(struct sign
+ * Other callers might not initialize the si_lsb field,
+ * so check explicitly for the right codes here.
+ */
+- if (kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR ||
+- kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO)
++ if (kinfo->si_signo == SIGBUS &&
++ (kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR ||
++ kinfo->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO))
+ err |= __put_user((short) kinfo->si_addr_lsb,
+ &uinfo->ssi_addr_lsb);
+ #endif