Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
- Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
+ Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
+ Chris Wedgewood <reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org>,
+ torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: [00/@num@] -stable review
-This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.11.@rel@ release. There
-are @num@ patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one.
-If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If
-anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to add a
-signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
+This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.16.@rel@ release.
+There are @num@ patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
+to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
+let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
+wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
-These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the Cc: line.
-If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable@kernel.org to add your name to
-the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list, also email us.
+These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
+Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable@kernel.org
+to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
+also email us.
-Responses should be made by @date (day, month date, time)@ UTC. Anything received after
-that time, might be too late.
+Responses should be made by @date (day, month date, time)@ UTC.
+Anything received after that time, might be too late.
thanks,