+++ /dev/null
-From khalid.aziz@oracle.com Wed Oct 2 19:38:33 2013
-From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:54:09 -0600
-Subject: mm: fix aio performance regression for database caused by THP
-To: bhutchings@solarflare.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, pshelar@nicira.com, cl@linux.com, aarcange@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, riel@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
-Message-ID: <1379966049.30551.9.camel@concerto>
-
-From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
-
-commit 7cb2ef56e6a8b7b368b2e883a0a47d02fed66911 upstream.
-
-This patch needed to be backported due to changes to mm/swap.c some time
-after 3.6 kernel.
-
-I am working with a tool that simulates oracle database I/O workload.
-This tool (orion to be specific -
-<http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/iodesign.htm#autoId24>)
-allocates hugetlbfs pages using shmget() with SHM_HUGETLB flag. It then
-does aio into these pages from flash disks using various common block
-sizes used by database. I am looking at performance with two of the most
-common block sizes - 1M and 64K. aio performance with these two block
-sizes plunged after Transparent HugePages was introduced in the kernel.
-Here are performance numbers:
-
- pre-THP 2.6.39 3.11-rc5
-1M read 8384 MB/s 5629 MB/s 6501 MB/s
-64K read 7867 MB/s 4576 MB/s 4251 MB/s
-
-I have narrowed the performance impact down to the overheads introduced by
-THP in __get_page_tail() and put_compound_page() routines. perf top shows
->40% of cycles being spent in these two routines. Every time direct I/O
-to hugetlbfs pages starts, kernel calls get_page() to grab a reference to
-the pages and calls put_page() when I/O completes to put the reference
-away. THP introduced significant amount of locking overhead to get_page()
-and put_page() when dealing with compound pages because hugepages can be
-split underneath get_page() and put_page(). It added this overhead
-irrespective of whether it is dealing with hugetlbfs pages or transparent
-hugepages. This resulted in 20%-45% drop in aio performance when using
-hugetlbfs pages.
-
-Since hugetlbfs pages can not be split, there is no reason to go through
-all the locking overhead for these pages from what I can see. I added
-code to __get_page_tail() and put_compound_page() to bypass all the
-locking code when working with hugetlbfs pages. This improved performance
-significantly. Performance numbers with this patch:
-
- pre-THP 3.11-rc5 3.11-rc5 + Patch
-1M read 8384 MB/s 6501 MB/s 8371 MB/s
-64K read 7867 MB/s 4251 MB/s 6510 MB/s
-
-Performance with 64K read is still lower than what it was before THP, but
-still a 53% improvement. It does mean there is more work to be done but I
-will take a 53% improvement for now.
-
-Please take a look at the following patch and let me know if it looks
-reasonable.
-
-[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comments]
-Signed-off-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
-Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
-Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
-Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
-Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
-Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
-Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
-Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
-Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
-Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- mm/swap.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
-
---- a/mm/swap.c
-+++ b/mm/swap.c
-@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec[NR_
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs);
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs);
-
-+int PageHuge(struct page *page);
-+
- /*
- * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally
- * freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking.
-@@ -69,13 +71,26 @@ static void __put_compound_page(struct p
- {
- compound_page_dtor *dtor;
-
-- __page_cache_release(page);
-+ if (!PageHuge(page))
-+ __page_cache_release(page);
- dtor = get_compound_page_dtor(page);
- (*dtor)(page);
- }
-
- static void put_compound_page(struct page *page)
- {
-+ /*
-+ * hugetlbfs pages can not be split from under us. So if this
-+ * is a hugetlbfs page, check refcount on head page and release
-+ * the page if refcount is zero.
-+ */
-+ if (PageHuge(page)) {
-+ page = compound_head(page);
-+ if (put_page_testzero(page))
-+ __put_compound_page(page);
-+ return;
-+ }
-+
- if (unlikely(PageTail(page))) {
- /* __split_huge_page_refcount can run under us */
- struct page *page_head = compound_trans_head(page);
-@@ -158,26 +173,40 @@ bool __get_page_tail(struct page *page)
- * proper PT lock that already serializes against
- * split_huge_page().
- */
-- unsigned long flags;
- bool got = false;
-- struct page *page_head = compound_trans_head(page);
-
-- if (likely(page != page_head && get_page_unless_zero(page_head))) {
-- /*
-- * page_head wasn't a dangling pointer but it
-- * may not be a head page anymore by the time
-- * we obtain the lock. That is ok as long as it
-- * can't be freed from under us.
-- */
-- flags = compound_lock_irqsave(page_head);
-- /* here __split_huge_page_refcount won't run anymore */
-- if (likely(PageTail(page))) {
-- __get_page_tail_foll(page, false);
-- got = true;
-+ /*
-+ * If this is a hugetlbfs page, it can not be split under
-+ * us. Simply increment counts for tail page and its head page
-+ */
-+ if (PageHuge(page)) {
-+ struct page *page_head;
-+
-+ page_head = compound_head(page);
-+ atomic_inc(&page_head->_count);
-+ got = true;
-+ } else {
-+ struct page *page_head = compound_trans_head(page);
-+ unsigned long flags;
-+
-+ if (likely(page != page_head &&
-+ get_page_unless_zero(page_head))) {
-+ /*
-+ * page_head wasn't a dangling pointer but it
-+ * may not be a head page anymore by the time
-+ * we obtain the lock. That is ok as long as it
-+ * can't be freed from under us.
-+ */
-+ flags = compound_lock_irqsave(page_head);
-+ /* here __split_huge_page_refcount won't run anymore */
-+ if (likely(PageTail(page))) {
-+ __get_page_tail_foll(page, false);
-+ got = true;
-+ }
-+ compound_unlock_irqrestore(page_head, flags);
-+ if (unlikely(!got))
-+ put_page(page_head);
- }
-- compound_unlock_irqrestore(page_head, flags);
-- if (unlikely(!got))
-- put_page(page_head);
- }
- return got;
- }