* TODO (cygwin): food for though re: mutually dependant dlls.

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index a8837dc7b1ef596f8b22857761104daf69c24d57..cc934bfa163cf567c395fd3065414c01855fc782 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+1999-03-23  Gary V. Vaughan  <gvaughan@oranda.demon.co.uk>
+
+       * TODO (cygwin):  food for though re: mutually dependant dlls.
+
 1999-03-21  Alexandre Oliva  <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
 
        * tests/build-relink.test: if we relink and have hardcode_direct, 

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index d1487063f0a65672ff8f0a9c4f62b6f6027d9784..f4b855a35c8320282d1f9c871ed1a2eba6efe506 100644 (file)
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ import lib differently than if it will be linked with a static lib.  This will
 almost definitely require that automake pass some hints about linkage in to
 each object compilation line.
 
+* jeffdb@goodnet.com writes
+       all you need to do for mutually dependant
+       .dll's is to create an implib from a .def file
+so it appears that we might need to detect and handle mutual dependencies
+specially on win32 =(O|
+
 * If not cross-compiling, have the static flag test run the resulting
 binary to make sure everything works.