proc: Fix typo in the comment

The deference here confuses me.

Maybe here want to say that because show_fd_locks() does not dereference
the files pointer, using the stale value of the files pointer is safe.

Correctly spelled comments make it easier for the reader to understand
the code.

replace 'deferences' with 'dereferences' in the comment &
replace 'inialized' with 'initialized' in the comment.

Signed-off-by: Yan Zhen <yanzhen@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909063353.2246419-1-yanzhen@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

diff --git a/fs/proc/fd.c b/fs/proc/fd.c
index 586bbc84ca04307a4962f6d06bca9409b206e080..7baafb1eba1306eb3ab35126e653930b22e65cff 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/proc/fd.c
+++ b/fs/proc/fd.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
                   real_mount(file->f_path.mnt)->mnt_id,
                   file_inode(file)->i_ino);
 
-       /* show_fd_locks() never deferences files so a stale value is safe */
+       /* show_fd_locks() never dereferences files, so a stale value is safe */
        show_fd_locks(m, file, files);
        if (seq_has_overflowed(m))
                goto out;

diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
index 8e08a9a1b7ed57dba829dd104929d2dcb7a30ecc..7d0acdad74e2ffd916b3e3b8deb51918dfad67cb 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int kcore_ram_list(struct list_head *list)
        int nid, ret;
        unsigned long end_pfn;
 
-       /* Not inialized....update now */
+       /* Not initialized....update now */
        /* find out "max pfn" */
        end_pfn = 0;
        for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {