Let's say you have the following three trees, where Base is from one commit
behind either master or branch:
Base : bar_v1, foo/{file1, file2, file3}
branch: bar_v2, foo/{file1, file2}, goo/file3
master: bar_v3, foo/{file1, file2, file3}
Using git-am (or am-based rebase) to apply the changes from branch onto
master results in the following tree:
Result: bar_merged, goo/{file1, file2, file3}
This is not what users want; they did not rename foo/ -> goo/, they only
renamed one file within that directory. The reason this happens is am
constructs fake trees (via build_fake_ancestor()) of the following form:
Base_bfa : bar_v1, foo/file3
branch_bfa: bar_v2, goo/file3
Combining these two trees with master's tree:
master: bar_v3, foo/{file1, file2, file3},
You can see that merge_recursive_generic() would see branch_bfa as renaming
foo/ -> goo/, and master as just adding both foo/file1 and foo/file2. As
such, it ends up with goo/{file1, file2, file3}
The core problem is that am does not have access to the original trees; it
can only construct trees using the blobs involved in the patch. As such,
it is not safe to perform directory rename detection within am -3.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
o.branch1 = "HEAD";
their_tree_name = xstrfmt("%.*s", linelen(state->msg), state->msg);
o.branch2 = their_tree_name;
+ o.detect_directory_renames = 0;
if (state->quiet)
o.verbosity = 0;
)
'
-test_expect_failure 'rebase (am): NO directory rename' '
+test_expect_success 'rebase (am): NO directory rename' '
test_when_finished "git -C no-dir-rename rebase --abort" &&
(
cd no-dir-rename &&
)
'
-test_expect_failure 'am: NO directory rename' '
+test_expect_success 'am: NO directory rename' '
test_when_finished "git -C no-dir-rename am --abort" &&
(
cd no-dir-rename &&