To stay consistent with the naming pattern used for similar cases in BPF
UAPI (__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE, etc), rename MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE into
__MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE.
Also similar to MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE and MAX_BPF_REG, add:
#define MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE
Not all __MAX_xxx enums have such #define, so I'm not sure if we should
add it or not, but I figured I'll start with a completely backwards
compatible way, and we can drop that, if necessary.
Also adjust a selftest that used MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE enum.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206190920.1651226-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX = 11,
BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI = 12,
BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT = 13,
- MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
+ __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
};
+#define MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE
+
enum bpf_perf_event_type {
BPF_PERF_EVENT_UNSPEC = 0,
BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE = 1,
BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX = 11,
BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI = 12,
BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT = 13,
- MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
+ __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
};
+#define MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE
+
enum bpf_perf_event_type {
BPF_PERF_EVENT_UNSPEC = 0,
BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE = 1,
const char *link_type_str;
char buf[256];
- if (link_type == MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE)
+ if (link_type == __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE)
continue;
link_type_name = btf__str_by_offset(btf, e->name_off);