--- /dev/null
+From e35fca4791fcdd43dc1fd769797df40c562ab491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
+Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 20:40:12 -0300
+Subject: edac: avoid mce decoding crash after edac driver unloaded
+
+From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
+
+commit e35fca4791fcdd43dc1fd769797df40c562ab491 upstream.
+
+Some edac drivers register themselves as mce decoders via
+notifier_chain. But in current notifier_chain implementation logic,
+it doesn't accept same notifier registered twice. If so, it will be
+wrong when adding/removing the element from the list. For example,
+on one SandyBridge platform, remove module sb_edac and then trigger
+one error, it will hit oops because it has no mce decoder registered
+but related notifier_chain still points to an invalid callback
+function. Here is an example:
+
+Call Trace:
+ [<ffffffff8150ef6a>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
+ [<ffffffff8102b936>] mce_log+0x46/0x180
+ [<ffffffff8102eaea>] apei_mce_report_mem_error+0x4a/0x60
+ [<ffffffff812e19d2>] ghes_do_proc+0x192/0x210
+ [<ffffffff812e2066>] ghes_proc+0x46/0x70
+ [<ffffffff812e20d8>] ghes_notify_sci+0x48/0x80
+ [<ffffffff8150ef05>] notifier_call_chain+0x55/0x80
+ [<ffffffff81076f1a>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0x80
+ [<ffffffff812aea11>] ? acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x23/0x23
+ [<ffffffff81076f56>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
+ [<ffffffff812ddc4d>] acpi_hed_notify+0x19/0x1b
+ [<ffffffff812b16bd>] acpi_device_notify+0x19/0x1b
+ [<ffffffff812beb38>] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x67/0x7f
+ [<ffffffff812aea3a>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x29/0x36
+ [<ffffffff81069dc2>] process_one_work+0x132/0x450
+ [<ffffffff8106bbcb>] worker_thread+0x17b/0x3c0
+ [<ffffffff8106ba50>] ? manage_workers+0x120/0x120
+ [<ffffffff81070aee>] kthread+0x9e/0xb0
+ [<ffffffff81514724>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
+ [<ffffffff81070a50>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
+ [<ffffffff81514720>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
+Code: f3 49 89 d4 45 85 ed 4d 89 c6 48 8b 0f 74 48 48 85 c9 75 17 eb 41
+0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 41 83 ed 01 4c 89 f9 74 22 4d 85 ff 74 1d <4c> 8b
+79 08 4c 89 e2 48 89 de 48 89 cf ff 11 4d 85 f6 74 04 41
+RIP [<ffffffff8150eef6>] notifier_call_chain+0x46/0x80
+ RSP <ffff88042868fb20>
+CR2: ffffffffa01af838
+---[ end trace 0100930068e73e6f ]---
+BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffff8
+IP: [<ffffffff810705b0>] kthread_data+0x10/0x20
+PGD 1a0d067 PUD 1a0e067 PMD 0
+Oops: 0000 [#2] SMP
+
+Only i7core_edac and sb_edac have such issues because they have more
+than one memory controller which means they have to register mce
+decoder many times.
+
+Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c | 15 ++++-----------
+ drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 8 ++++----
+ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c
++++ b/drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c
+@@ -1932,12 +1932,6 @@ static int i7core_mce_check_error(struct
+ if (mce->bank != 8)
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+- /* Only handle if it is the right mc controller */
+- if (mce->socketid != pvt->i7core_dev->socket)
+- return NOTIFY_DONE;
+-#endif
+-
+ smp_rmb();
+ if ((pvt->mce_out + 1) % MCE_LOG_LEN == pvt->mce_in) {
+ smp_wmb();
+@@ -2234,8 +2228,6 @@ static void i7core_unregister_mci(struct
+ if (pvt->enable_scrub)
+ disable_sdram_scrub_setting(mci);
+
+- mce_unregister_decode_chain(&i7_mce_dec);
+-
+ /* Disable EDAC polling */
+ i7core_pci_ctl_release(pvt);
+
+@@ -2336,8 +2328,6 @@ static int i7core_register_mci(struct i7
+ /* DCLK for scrub rate setting */
+ pvt->dclk_freq = get_dclk_freq();
+
+- mce_register_decode_chain(&i7_mce_dec);
+-
+ return 0;
+
+ fail0:
+@@ -2481,8 +2471,10 @@ static int __init i7core_init(void)
+
+ pci_rc = pci_register_driver(&i7core_driver);
+
+- if (pci_rc >= 0)
++ if (pci_rc >= 0) {
++ mce_register_decode_chain(&i7_mce_dec);
+ return 0;
++ }
+
+ i7core_printk(KERN_ERR, "Failed to register device with error %d.\n",
+ pci_rc);
+@@ -2498,6 +2490,7 @@ static void __exit i7core_exit(void)
+ {
+ debugf2("MC: " __FILE__ ": %s()\n", __func__);
+ pci_unregister_driver(&i7core_driver);
++ mce_unregister_decode_chain(&i7_mce_dec);
+ }
+
+ module_init(i7core_init);
+--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
++++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+@@ -1669,8 +1669,6 @@ static void sbridge_unregister_mci(struc
+ debugf0("MC: " __FILE__ ": %s(): mci = %p, dev = %p\n",
+ __func__, mci, &sbridge_dev->pdev[0]->dev);
+
+- mce_unregister_decode_chain(&sbridge_mce_dec);
+-
+ /* Remove MC sysfs nodes */
+ edac_mc_del_mc(mci->dev);
+
+@@ -1738,7 +1736,6 @@ static int sbridge_register_mci(struct s
+ goto fail0;
+ }
+
+- mce_register_decode_chain(&sbridge_mce_dec);
+ return 0;
+
+ fail0:
+@@ -1867,8 +1864,10 @@ static int __init sbridge_init(void)
+
+ pci_rc = pci_register_driver(&sbridge_driver);
+
+- if (pci_rc >= 0)
++ if (pci_rc >= 0) {
++ mce_register_decode_chain(&sbridge_mce_dec);
+ return 0;
++ }
+
+ sbridge_printk(KERN_ERR, "Failed to register device with error %d.\n",
+ pci_rc);
+@@ -1884,6 +1883,7 @@ static void __exit sbridge_exit(void)
+ {
+ debugf2("MC: " __FILE__ ": %s()\n", __func__);
+ pci_unregister_driver(&sbridge_driver);
++ mce_unregister_decode_chain(&sbridge_mce_dec);
+ }
+
+ module_init(sbridge_init);
--- /dev/null
+From 2cbb587d3bc41a305168e91b4f3c5b6944a12566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
+Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 05:51:26 -0300
+Subject: edac: fix the error about memory type detection on SandyBridge
+
+From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
+
+commit 2cbb587d3bc41a305168e91b4f3c5b6944a12566 upstream.
+
+On SandyBridge, DDRIOA(Dev: 17 Func: 0 Offset: 328) is used
+to detect whether DIMM is RDIMM/LRDIMM, not TA(Dev: 15 Func: 0).
+
+Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
++++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int get_dimm_config(const struct
+ pvt->is_close_pg = false;
+ }
+
+- pci_read_config_dword(pvt->pci_ta, RANK_CFG_A, ®);
++ pci_read_config_dword(pvt->pci_ddrio, RANK_CFG_A, ®);
+ if (IS_RDIMM_ENABLED(reg)) {
+ /* FIXME: Can also be LRDIMM */
+ debugf0("Memory is registered\n");