--- /dev/null
+From 2a2b435ca40a18fe9fa663f371988f2d4c468d8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 11:42:18 +0100
+Subject: Revert "block: ratelimit handle_bad_sector() message"
+
+From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+This reverts commit f86b9bf6228bb334fe1addcd566a658ecbd08f7e which is
+commit f4ac712e4fe009635344b9af5d890fe25fcc8c0d upstream.
+
+Jari Ruusu writes:
+
+ Above change "block: ratelimit handle_bad_sector() message"
+ upstream commit f4ac712e4fe009635344b9af5d890fe25fcc8c0d
+ in 4.19.154 kernel is not completely OK.
+
+ Removing casts from arguments 4 and 5 produces these compile warnings:
+
+ ...
+
+ For 64 bit systems it is only compile time cosmetic warning. For 32 bit
+ system + CONFIG_LBDAF=n it introduces bugs: output formats are "%llu" and
+ passed parameters are 32 bits. That is not OK.
+
+ Upstream kernels have hardcoded 64 bit sector_t. In older stable trees
+ sector_t can be either 64 or 32 bit. In other words, backport of above patch
+ needs to keep those original casts.
+
+And Tetsuo Handa writes:
+ Indeed, commit f4ac712e4fe00963 ("block: ratelimit handle_bad_sector() message")
+ depends on commit 72deb455b5ec619f ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF") which was merged
+ into 5.2 kernel.
+
+So let's revert it.
+
+Reported-by: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>
+Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
+Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
+Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ block/blk-core.c | 9 +++++----
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/block/blk-core.c
++++ b/block/blk-core.c
+@@ -2127,10 +2127,11 @@ static void handle_bad_sector(struct bio
+ {
+ char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
+
+- pr_info_ratelimited("attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
+- "%s: rw=%d, want=%llu, limit=%llu\n",
+- bio_devname(bio, b), bio->bi_opf,
+- bio_end_sector(bio), maxsector);
++ printk(KERN_INFO "attempt to access beyond end of device\n");
++ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: rw=%d, want=%Lu, limit=%Lu\n",
++ bio_devname(bio, b), bio->bi_opf,
++ (unsigned long long)bio_end_sector(bio),
++ (long long)maxsector);
+ }
+
+ #ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST