Color options like color.interactive and color.diff should fall back to
the value of color.ui if they aren't set. In add-interactive, we check
the specific options (e.g., color.diff) via repo_config_get_value(),
which does not depend on the main command having loaded any color config
via the git_config() callback mechanism.
But then we call want_color() on the result; if our specific config is
unset then that function uses the value of git_use_color_default. That
variable is typically set from color.ui by the git_color_config()
callback, which is called by the main command in its own git_config()
callback function.
This works fine for "add -p", whose add_config() callback calls into
git_color_config(). But it doesn't work for other commands like
"checkout -p", which is otherwise unaware of color at all. People tend
not to notice because the default is "auto", and that's what they'd set
color.ui to as well. But something like:
git -c color.ui=false checkout -p
should disable color, and it doesn't.
This regression goes back to
0527ccb1b5 (add -i: default to the built-in
implementation, 2021-11-30). In the perl version we got the color config
from "git config --get-colorbool", which did the full lookup for us.
The obvious fix is for git-checkout to add a call to git_color_config()
to its own config callback. But we'd have to do so for every command
with this problem, which is error-prone. Let's see if we can fix it more
centrally.
It is tempting to teach want_color() to look up the value of
repo_config_get_value("color.ui") itself. But I think that would have
disastrous consequences. Plumbing commands, especially older ones, avoid
porcelain config like "color.*" by simply not parsing it in their config
callbacks. Looking up the value of color.ui under the hood would
undermine that.
Instead, let's do that lookup in the add-interactive setup code. We're
already demand-loading other color config there, which is probably fine
(even in a plumbing command like "git reset", the interactive mode is
inherently porcelain-ish). That catches all commands that use the
interactive code, whether they were calling git_color_config()
themselves or not.
Reported-by: Isaac Oscar Gariano <isaacoscar@live.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ret = -1;
else
ret = git_config_colorbool(var, value);
+
+ /*
+ * Do not rely on want_color() to fall back to color.ui for us. It uses
+ * the value parsed by git_color_config(), which may not have been
+ * called by the main command.
+ */
+ if (ret < 0 && !repo_config_get_value(r, "color.ui", &value))
+ ret = git_config_colorbool("color.ui", value);
+
return want_color(ret);
}
test_grep "@@ -2,20 +2,20 @@" actual
'
+test_expect_success 'set up base for -p color tests' '
+ echo commit >file &&
+ git commit -am "commit state" &&
+ git tag patch-base
+'
+
for cmd in add checkout commit reset restore "stash save" "stash push"
do
test_expect_success "$cmd rejects invalid context options" '
test_must_fail git $cmd --inter-hunk-context 2 2>actual &&
test_grep -E ".--inter-hunk-context. requires .(--interactive/)?--patch." actual
'
+
+ test_expect_success "$cmd falls back to color.ui" '
+ git reset --hard patch-base &&
+ echo working-tree >file &&
+ test_write_lines y |
+ force_color git -c color.ui=false $cmd -p >output.raw 2>&1 &&
+ test_decode_color <output.raw >output &&
+ test_cmp output.raw output
+ '
done
test_done