--- /dev/null
+From stable-bounces@linux.kernel.org Sun Jul 2 03:49:42 2006
+Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 11:53:01 +0100
+From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
+To: stable@kernel.org
+Cc: len.brown@intel.com, robert.moore@intel.com
+Subject: [stable] [PATCH] Reduce ACPI verbosity on null handle condition
+
+From: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
+
+As detailed at http://bugs.gentoo.org/131534 :
+
+2.6.16 converted many ACPI debug messages into error or warning
+messages. One extraneous message was incorrectly converted, resulting in
+logs being flooded by "Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative" messages
+on some systems.
+
+This patch (part of a larger ACPICA commit) converts the message back to
+debug level.
+
+Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
+Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
+---
+ drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c | 5 +++--
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- linux-2.6.17.3.orig/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c
++++ linux-2.6.17.3/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c
+@@ -238,8 +238,9 @@ acpi_evaluate_object(acpi_handle handle,
+ ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
+ "Both Handle and Pathname are NULL"));
+ } else {
+- ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
+- "Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative"));
++ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
++ "Null Handle with relative pathname [%s]",
++ pathname));
+ }
+
+ status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;