--- /dev/null
+From ddc204b517e60ae64db34f9832dc41dafa77c751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:39:12 -0500
+Subject: copy_process(): Move fd_install() out of sighand->siglock critical section
+
+From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+
+commit ddc204b517e60ae64db34f9832dc41dafa77c751 upstream.
+
+I was made aware of the following lockdep splat:
+
+[ 2516.308763] =====================================================
+[ 2516.309085] WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
+[ 2516.309433] 5.14.0-51.el9.aarch64+debug #1 Not tainted
+[ 2516.309703] -----------------------------------------------------
+[ 2516.310149] stress-ng/153663 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
+[ 2516.310512] ffff0000e422b198 (&newf->file_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: fd_install+0x368/0x4f0
+[ 2516.310944]
+ and this task is already holding:
+[ 2516.311248] ffff0000c08140d8 (&sighand->siglock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: copy_process+0x1e2c/0x3e80
+[ 2516.311804] which would create a new lock dependency:
+[ 2516.312066] (&sighand->siglock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (&newf->file_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
+[ 2516.312446]
+ but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
+[ 2516.312983] (&sighand->siglock){-.-.}-{2:2}
+ :
+[ 2516.330700] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
+
+[ 2516.331075] CPU0 CPU1
+[ 2516.331328] ---- ----
+[ 2516.331580] lock(&newf->file_lock);
+[ 2516.331790] local_irq_disable();
+[ 2516.332231] lock(&sighand->siglock);
+[ 2516.332579] lock(&newf->file_lock);
+[ 2516.332922] <Interrupt>
+[ 2516.333069] lock(&sighand->siglock);
+[ 2516.333291]
+ *** DEADLOCK ***
+[ 2516.389845]
+ stack backtrace:
+[ 2516.390101] CPU: 3 PID: 153663 Comm: stress-ng Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-51.el9.aarch64+debug #1
+[ 2516.390756] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
+[ 2516.391155] Call trace:
+[ 2516.391302] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3e0
+[ 2516.391518] show_stack+0x24/0x30
+[ 2516.391717] dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd8
+[ 2516.391938] dump_stack+0x1c/0x38
+[ 2516.392247] print_bad_irq_dependency+0x620/0x710
+[ 2516.392525] check_irq_usage+0x4fc/0x86c
+[ 2516.392756] check_prev_add+0x180/0x1d90
+[ 2516.392988] validate_chain+0x8e0/0xee0
+[ 2516.393215] __lock_acquire+0x97c/0x1e40
+[ 2516.393449] lock_acquire.part.0+0x240/0x570
+[ 2516.393814] lock_acquire+0x90/0xb4
+[ 2516.394021] _raw_spin_lock+0xe8/0x154
+[ 2516.394244] fd_install+0x368/0x4f0
+[ 2516.394451] copy_process+0x1f5c/0x3e80
+[ 2516.394678] kernel_clone+0x134/0x660
+[ 2516.394895] __do_sys_clone3+0x130/0x1f4
+[ 2516.395128] __arm64_sys_clone3+0x5c/0x7c
+[ 2516.395478] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x78/0x1f0
+[ 2516.395762] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x22c/0x2c4
+[ 2516.396050] do_el0_svc+0xb0/0x10c
+[ 2516.396252] el0_svc+0x24/0x34
+[ 2516.396436] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x12c
+[ 2516.396688] el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
+[ 2517.491197] NET: Registered PF_ATMPVC protocol family
+[ 2517.491524] NET: Registered PF_ATMSVC protocol family
+[ 2591.991877] sched: RT throttling activated
+
+One way to solve this problem is to move the fd_install() call out of
+the sighand->siglock critical section.
+
+Before commit 6fd2fe494b17 ("copy_process(): don't use ksys_close()
+on cleanups"), the pidfd installation was done without holding both
+the task_list lock and the sighand->siglock. Obviously, holding these
+two locks are not really needed to protect the fd_install() call.
+So move the fd_install() call down to after the releases of both locks.
+
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208163912.1084752-1-longman@redhat.com
+Fixes: 6fd2fe494b17 ("copy_process(): don't use ksys_close() on cleanups")
+Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
+Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ kernel/fork.c | 7 +++----
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/fork.c
++++ b/kernel/fork.c
+@@ -2258,10 +2258,6 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_stru
+ goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
+ }
+
+- /* past the last point of failure */
+- if (pidfile)
+- fd_install(pidfd, pidfile);
+-
+ init_task_pid_links(p);
+ if (likely(p->pid)) {
+ ptrace_init_task(p, (clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE) || trace);
+@@ -2310,6 +2306,9 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_stru
+ syscall_tracepoint_update(p);
+ write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+
++ if (pidfile)
++ fd_install(pidfd, pidfile);
++
+ proc_fork_connector(p);
+ sched_post_fork(p, args);
+ cgroup_post_fork(p, args);
--- /dev/null
+From da2ad87fba0891576aadda9161b8505fde81a84d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
+Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:12:39 +0800
+Subject: dmaengine: sh: rcar-dmac: Check for error num after dma_set_max_seg_size
+
+From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
+
+commit da2ad87fba0891576aadda9161b8505fde81a84d upstream.
+
+As the possible failure of the dma_set_max_seg_size(), it should be
+better to check the return value of the dma_set_max_seg_size().
+
+Fixes: 97d49c59e219 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: set scatter/gather max segment size")
+Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
+Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
+Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220111011239.452837-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn
+Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 5 ++++-
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
++++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
+@@ -1844,7 +1844,10 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platfo
+
+ dmac->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dmac);
+- dma_set_max_seg_size(dmac->dev, RCAR_DMATCR_MASK);
++ ret = dma_set_max_seg_size(dmac->dev, RCAR_DMATCR_MASK);
++ if (ret)
++ return ret;
++
+ ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dmac->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
--- /dev/null
+From e831c7aba950f3ae94002b10321279654525e5ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
+Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 08:53:36 +0000
+Subject: dmaengine: stm32-dmamux: Fix PM disable depth imbalance in stm32_dmamux_probe
+
+From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
+
+commit e831c7aba950f3ae94002b10321279654525e5ec upstream.
+
+The pm_runtime_enable will increase power disable depth.
+If the probe fails, we should use pm_runtime_disable() to balance
+pm_runtime_enable().
+
+Fixes: 4f3ceca254e0 ("dmaengine: stm32-dmamux: Add PM Runtime support")
+Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
+Reviewed-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220108085336.11992-1-linmq006@gmail.com
+Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c | 4 +++-
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c
++++ b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c
+@@ -292,10 +292,12 @@ static int stm32_dmamux_probe(struct pla
+ ret = of_dma_router_register(node, stm32_dmamux_route_allocate,
+ &stm32_dmamux->dmarouter);
+ if (ret)
+- goto err_clk;
++ goto pm_disable;
+
+ return 0;
+
++pm_disable:
++ pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+ err_clk:
+ clk_disable_unprepare(stm32_dmamux->clk);
+
--- /dev/null
+From 834cea3a252ed4847db076a769ad9efe06afe2d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
+Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:27:35 +0100
+Subject: i2c: brcmstb: fix support for DSL and CM variants
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
+
+commit 834cea3a252ed4847db076a769ad9efe06afe2d5 upstream.
+
+DSL and CM (Cable Modem) support 8 B max transfer size and have a custom
+DT binding for that reason. This driver was checking for a wrong
+"compatible" however which resulted in an incorrect setup.
+
+Fixes: e2e5a2c61837 ("i2c: brcmstb: Adding support for CM and DSL SoCs")
+Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
+Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
++++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
+@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int brcmstb_i2c_probe(struct plat
+
+ /* set the data in/out register size for compatible SoCs */
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->device->of_node,
+- "brcmstb,brcmper-i2c"))
++ "brcm,brcmper-i2c"))
+ dev->data_regsz = sizeof(u8);
+ else
+ dev->data_regsz = sizeof(u32);
--- /dev/null
+From a0d48505a1d68e27220369e2dd1e3573a2f362d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
+Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 18:47:00 +0200
+Subject: i2c: qcom-cci: don't delete an unregistered adapter
+
+From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
+
+commit a0d48505a1d68e27220369e2dd1e3573a2f362d2 upstream.
+
+If i2c_add_adapter() fails to add an I2C adapter found on QCOM CCI
+controller, on error path i2c_del_adapter() is still called.
+
+Fortunately there is a sanity check in the I2C core, so the only
+visible implication is a printed debug level message:
+
+ i2c-core: attempting to delete unregistered adapter [Qualcomm-CCI]
+
+Nevertheless it would be reasonable to correct the probe error path.
+
+Fixes: e517526195de ("i2c: Add Qualcomm CCI I2C driver")
+Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
+Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
+Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c
++++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c
+@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static int cci_probe(struct platform_dev
+ return 0;
+
+ error_i2c:
+- for (; i >= 0; i--) {
++ for (--i ; i >= 0; i--) {
+ if (cci->master[i].cci)
+ i2c_del_adapter(&cci->master[i].adap);
+ }
--- /dev/null
+From 02a4a69667a2ad32f3b52ca906f19628fbdd8a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
+Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 18:47:03 +0200
+Subject: i2c: qcom-cci: don't put a device tree node before i2c_add_adapter()
+
+From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
+
+commit 02a4a69667a2ad32f3b52ca906f19628fbdd8a01 upstream.
+
+There is a minor chance for a race, if a pointer to an i2c-bus subnode
+is stored and then reused after releasing its reference, and it would
+be sufficient to get one more reference under a loop over children
+subnodes.
+
+Fixes: e517526195de ("i2c: Add Qualcomm CCI I2C driver")
+Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
+Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
+Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c | 14 ++++++++++----
+ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c
++++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c
+@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static int cci_probe(struct platform_dev
+ cci->master[idx].adap.quirks = &cci->data->quirks;
+ cci->master[idx].adap.algo = &cci_algo;
+ cci->master[idx].adap.dev.parent = dev;
+- cci->master[idx].adap.dev.of_node = child;
++ cci->master[idx].adap.dev.of_node = of_node_get(child);
+ cci->master[idx].master = idx;
+ cci->master[idx].cci = cci;
+
+@@ -643,8 +643,10 @@ static int cci_probe(struct platform_dev
+ continue;
+
+ ret = i2c_add_adapter(&cci->master[i].adap);
+- if (ret < 0)
++ if (ret < 0) {
++ of_node_put(cci->master[i].adap.dev.of_node);
+ goto error_i2c;
++ }
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, MSEC_PER_SEC);
+@@ -656,8 +658,10 @@ static int cci_probe(struct platform_dev
+
+ error_i2c:
+ for (--i ; i >= 0; i--) {
+- if (cci->master[i].cci)
++ if (cci->master[i].cci) {
+ i2c_del_adapter(&cci->master[i].adap);
++ of_node_put(cci->master[i].adap.dev.of_node);
++ }
+ }
+ error:
+ disable_irq(cci->irq);
+@@ -673,8 +677,10 @@ static int cci_remove(struct platform_de
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cci->data->num_masters; i++) {
+- if (cci->master[i].cci)
++ if (cci->master[i].cci) {
+ i2c_del_adapter(&cci->master[i].adap);
++ of_node_put(cci->master[i].adap.dev.of_node);
++ }
+ cci_halt(cci, i);
+ }
+
--- /dev/null
+From 28df029d53a2fd80c1b8674d47895648ad26dcfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Cheng Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
+Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:50:11 +0800
+Subject: lockdep: Correct lock_classes index mapping
+
+From: Cheng Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
+
+commit 28df029d53a2fd80c1b8674d47895648ad26dcfb upstream.
+
+A kernel exception was hit when trying to dump /proc/lockdep_chains after
+lockdep report "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!":
+
+Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00054005450e05c3
+...
+00054005450e05c3] address between user and kernel address ranges
+...
+pc : [0xffffffece769b3a8] string+0x50/0x10c
+lr : [0xffffffece769ac88] vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c
+...
+ Call trace:
+ string+0x50/0x10c
+ vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c
+ seq_printf+0x8c/0xd8
+ print_name+0x64/0xf4
+ lc_show+0xb8/0x128
+ seq_read_iter+0x3cc/0x5fc
+ proc_reg_read_iter+0xdc/0x1d4
+
+The cause of the problem is the function lock_chain_get_class() will
+shift lock_classes index by 1, but the index don't need to be shifted
+anymore since commit 01bb6f0af992 ("locking/lockdep: Change the range
+of class_idx in held_lock struct") already change the index to start
+from 0.
+
+The lock_classes[-1] located at chain_hlocks array. When printing
+lock_classes[-1] after the chain_hlocks entries are modified, the
+exception happened.
+
+The output of lockdep_chains are incorrect due to this problem too.
+
+Fixes: f611e8cf98ec ("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey")
+Signed-off-by: Cheng Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
+Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
+Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220210105011.21712-1-cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
++++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+@@ -3387,7 +3387,7 @@ struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(
+ u16 chain_hlock = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i];
+ unsigned int class_idx = chain_hlock_class_idx(chain_hlock);
+
+- return lock_classes + class_idx - 1;
++ return lock_classes + class_idx;
+ }
+
+ /*
+@@ -3455,7 +3455,7 @@ static void print_chain_keys_chain(struc
+ hlock_id = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i];
+ chain_key = print_chain_key_iteration(hlock_id, chain_key);
+
+- print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id) - 1);
++ print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id));
+ printk("\n");
+ }
+ }
edac-fix-calculation-of-returned-address-and-next-offset-in-edac_align_ptr.patch
net-sched-limit-tc_act_repeat-loops.patch
dmaengine-sh-rcar-dmac-check-for-error-num-after-setting-mask.patch
+dmaengine-stm32-dmamux-fix-pm-disable-depth-imbalance-in-stm32_dmamux_probe.patch
+dmaengine-sh-rcar-dmac-check-for-error-num-after-dma_set_max_seg_size.patch
+i2c-qcom-cci-don-t-delete-an-unregistered-adapter.patch
+i2c-qcom-cci-don-t-put-a-device-tree-node-before-i2c_add_adapter.patch
+copy_process-move-fd_install-out-of-sighand-siglock-critical-section.patch
+i2c-brcmstb-fix-support-for-dsl-and-cm-variants.patch
+lockdep-correct-lock_classes-index-mapping.patch