--- /dev/null
+From c4c40e51f9c32c6dd8adf606624c930a1c4d9bbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:36:23 -0700
+Subject: e1000e: Fix error path in link detection
+
+From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+
+commit c4c40e51f9c32c6dd8adf606624c930a1c4d9bbb upstream.
+
+In case of error from e1e_rphy(), the loop will exit early and "success"
+will be set to true erroneously.
+
+Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c | 7 ++++---
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c
+@@ -1744,6 +1744,7 @@ s32 e1000e_phy_has_link_generic(struct e
+ s32 ret_val = 0;
+ u16 i, phy_status;
+
++ *success = false;
+ for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
+ /* Some PHYs require the MII_BMSR register to be read
+ * twice due to the link bit being sticky. No harm doing
+@@ -1763,16 +1764,16 @@ s32 e1000e_phy_has_link_generic(struct e
+ ret_val = e1e_rphy(hw, MII_BMSR, &phy_status);
+ if (ret_val)
+ break;
+- if (phy_status & BMSR_LSTATUS)
++ if (phy_status & BMSR_LSTATUS) {
++ *success = true;
+ break;
++ }
+ if (usec_interval >= 1000)
+ msleep(usec_interval / 1000);
+ else
+ udelay(usec_interval);
+ }
+
+- *success = (i < iterations);
+-
+ return ret_val;
+ }
+
--- /dev/null
+From d3509f8bc7b0560044c15f0e3ecfde1d9af757a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:36:25 -0700
+Subject: e1000e: Fix return value test
+
+From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+
+commit d3509f8bc7b0560044c15f0e3ecfde1d9af757a6 upstream.
+
+All the helpers return -E1000_ERR_PHY.
+
+Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+@@ -5035,7 +5035,7 @@ static bool e1000e_has_link(struct e1000
+ break;
+ }
+
+- if ((ret_val == E1000_ERR_PHY) && (hw->phy.type == e1000_phy_igp_3) &&
++ if ((ret_val == -E1000_ERR_PHY) && (hw->phy.type == e1000_phy_igp_3) &&
+ (er32(CTRL) & E1000_PHY_CTRL_GBE_DISABLE)) {
+ /* See e1000_kmrn_lock_loss_workaround_ich8lan() */
+ e_info("Gigabit has been disabled, downgrading speed\n");
--- /dev/null
+From 19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:36:26 -0700
+Subject: e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up
+
+From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+
+commit 19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013 upstream.
+
+Lennart reported the following race condition:
+
+\ e1000_watchdog_task
+ \ e1000e_has_link
+ \ hw->mac.ops.check_for_link() === e1000e_check_for_copper_link
+ /* link is up */
+ mac->get_link_status = false;
+
+ /* interrupt */
+ \ e1000_msix_other
+ hw->mac.get_link_status = true;
+
+ link_active = !hw->mac.get_link_status
+ /* link_active is false, wrongly */
+
+This problem arises because the single flag get_link_status is used to
+signal two different states: link status needs checking and link status is
+down.
+
+Avoid the problem by using the return value of .check_for_link to signal
+the link status to e1000e_has_link().
+
+Reported-by: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
+Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
+Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c | 11 ++++++++---
+ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 +-
+ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
+@@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ void e1000e_clear_hw_cntrs_base(struct e
+ * Checks to see of the link status of the hardware has changed. If a
+ * change in link status has been detected, then we read the PHY registers
+ * to get the current speed/duplex if link exists.
++ *
++ * Returns a negative error code (-E1000_ERR_*) or 0 (link down) or 1 (link
++ * up).
+ **/
+ s32 e1000e_check_for_copper_link(struct e1000_hw *hw)
+ {
+@@ -423,7 +426,7 @@ s32 e1000e_check_for_copper_link(struct
+ * Change or Rx Sequence Error interrupt.
+ */
+ if (!mac->get_link_status)
+- return 0;
++ return 1;
+
+ /* First we want to see if the MII Status Register reports
+ * link. If so, then we want to get the current speed/duplex
+@@ -461,10 +464,12 @@ s32 e1000e_check_for_copper_link(struct
+ * different link partner.
+ */
+ ret_val = e1000e_config_fc_after_link_up(hw);
+- if (ret_val)
++ if (ret_val) {
+ e_dbg("Error configuring flow control\n");
++ return ret_val;
++ }
+
+- return ret_val;
++ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /**
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+@@ -5017,7 +5017,7 @@ static bool e1000e_has_link(struct e1000
+ case e1000_media_type_copper:
+ if (hw->mac.get_link_status) {
+ ret_val = hw->mac.ops.check_for_link(hw);
+- link_active = !hw->mac.get_link_status;
++ link_active = ret_val > 0;
+ } else {
+ link_active = true;
+ }
fscrypt-lock-mutex-before-checking-for-bounce-page-pool.patch
net-9p-switch-to-wait_event_killable.patch
pm-opp-add-missing-of_node_put-np.patch
+e1000e-fix-error-path-in-link-detection.patch
+e1000e-fix-return-value-test.patch
+e1000e-separate-signaling-for-link-check-link-up.patch