-C Add\stests\sto\sensure\s"PRAGMA\sincremental_vacuum"\sand\s"PRAGMA\sauto_vacuum\s=\sincremental"\shandle\scorrupt\sdatabases\scorrectly.
-D 2015-03-13T15:44:36.085
+C When\sa\sWHERE\sclause\scontains\sdisjuncts\swith\sthe\ssame\soperands,\stry\sto\ncombine\sthem\sinto\sa\ssingle\soperator.\s\sExample:\s\s(x=A\sOR\sx>A)\sbecomes\n(x>=A).
+D 2015-03-16T12:13:31.967
F Makefile.arm-wince-mingw32ce-gcc d6df77f1f48d690bd73162294bbba7f59507c72f
F Makefile.in 88a3e6261286db378fdffa1124cad11b3c05f5bb
F Makefile.linux-gcc 91d710bdc4998cb015f39edf3cb314ec4f4d7e23
F src/wal.c 39303f2c9db02a4e422cd8eb2c8760420c6a51fe
F src/wal.h df01efe09c5cb8c8e391ff1715cca294f89668a4
F src/walker.c c253b95b4ee44b21c406e2a1052636c31ea27804
-F src/where.c eb141b075776e9864d38f279333e2472a8653202
+F src/where.c b879a02e59c27f1447224fa2e79a7f2c7c345fd5
F src/whereInt.h cbe4aa57326998d89e7698ca65bb7c28541d483c
F test/8_3_names.test ebbb5cd36741350040fd28b432ceadf495be25b2
F test/aggerror.test a867e273ef9e3d7919f03ef4f0e8c0d2767944f2
F test/whereH.test e4b07f7a3c2f5d31195cd33710054c78667573b2
F test/whereI.test 1d89199697919d4930be05a71e7fe620f114e622
F test/whereJ.test 55a3221706a7ab706293f17cc8f96da563bf0767
+F test/whereK.test 78fb50c74c9a91efc97a1daa39bcf7b8b68d8bff
F test/wherelimit.test 5e9fd41e79bb2b2d588ed999d641d9c965619b31
F test/wild001.test bca33f499866f04c24510d74baf1e578d4e44b1c
F test/win32heap.test ea19770974795cff26e11575e12d422dbd16893c
F tool/warnings-clang.sh f6aa929dc20ef1f856af04a730772f59283631d4
F tool/warnings.sh 0abfd78ceb09b7f7c27c688c8e3fe93268a13b32
F tool/win/sqlite.vsix deb315d026cc8400325c5863eef847784a219a2f
-P 5aa522dcb9bfa18d49683f7cc889516984e2bcd2
-R a79445283a8ae7c7f85ae571d23bc239
-U dan
-Z d6c136b9ed1be16533c60706d0427e82
+P 1c2166cb2a387a0856f41b399c3648bf8c5fce73
+R 298b36c87aaf9227b23b4ea3e9cfdff1
+T *branch * combine-disjuncts
+T *sym-combine-disjuncts *
+T -sym-trunk *
+U drh
+Z 6e64b74890b4611813f6eecbfdcaf110
-1c2166cb2a387a0856f41b399c3648bf8c5fce73
\ No newline at end of file
+7a3097689d17625fb0dfc4372712f375f3bdb9a1
\ No newline at end of file
pWC->a[iParent].nChild++;
}
+/*
+** Return the N-th AND-connected subterm of pTerm. Or if pTerm is not
+** a conjunction, then return just pTerm when N==0. If N is exceeds
+** the number of available subterms, return NULL.
+*/
+static WhereTerm *whereNthSubterm(WhereTerm *pTerm, int N){
+ if( pTerm->eOperator!=WO_AND ){
+ return N==0 ? pTerm : 0;
+ }
+ if( N<pTerm->u.pAndInfo->wc.nTerm ){
+ return &pTerm->u.pAndInfo->wc.a[N];
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+** Subterms pOne and pTwo are contained within WHERE clause pWC. The
+** two subterms are in disjunction - they are OR-ed together.
+**
+** If these two terms are both of the form: "A op B" with the same
+** A and B values but different operators and if the operators are
+** compatible (if one is = and the other is <, for example) then
+** add a new virtual term to pWC that is the combination of the
+** two.
+**
+** Some examples:
+**
+** x<y OR x=y --> x<=y
+** x=y OR x=y --> x=y
+** x<=y OR x<y --> x<=y
+**
+** The following is NOT generated:
+**
+** x<y OR x>y --> x!=y
+*/
+static void whereCombineDisjuncts(
+ SrcList *pSrc, /* the FROM clause */
+ WhereClause *pWC, /* The complete WHERE clause */
+ WhereTerm *pOne, /* First disjunct */
+ WhereTerm *pTwo /* Second disjunct */
+){
+ u16 eOp = pOne->eOperator | pTwo->eOperator;
+ sqlite3 *db; /* Database connection (for malloc) */
+ Expr *pNew; /* New virtual expression */
+ int op; /* Operator for the combined expression */
+ int idxNew; /* Index in pWC of the next virtual term */
+
+ if( (pOne->eOperator & (WO_EQ|WO_LT|WO_LE|WO_GT|WO_GE))==0 ) return;
+ if( (pTwo->eOperator & (WO_EQ|WO_LT|WO_LE|WO_GT|WO_GE))==0 ) return;
+ if( (eOp & (WO_EQ|WO_LT|WO_LE))!=eOp
+ && (eOp & (WO_EQ|WO_GT|WO_GE))!=eOp ) return;
+ assert( pOne->pExpr->pLeft!=0 && pOne->pExpr->pRight!=0 );
+ assert( pTwo->pExpr->pLeft!=0 && pTwo->pExpr->pRight!=0 );
+ if( sqlite3ExprCompare(pOne->pExpr->pLeft, pTwo->pExpr->pLeft, -1) ) return;
+ if( sqlite3ExprCompare(pOne->pExpr->pRight, pTwo->pExpr->pRight, -1) )return;
+ /* If we reach this point, it means the two subterms can be combined */
+ if( (eOp & (eOp-1))!=0 ){
+ if( eOp & (WO_LT|WO_LE) ){
+ eOp = WO_LE;
+ }else{
+ assert( eOp & (WO_GT|WO_GE) );
+ eOp = WO_GE;
+ }
+ }
+ db = pWC->pWInfo->pParse->db;
+ pNew = sqlite3ExprDup(db, pOne->pExpr, 0);
+ if( pNew==0 ) return;
+ for(op=TK_EQ; eOp!=(WO_EQ<<(op-TK_EQ)); op++){ assert( op<TK_GE ); }
+ pNew->op = op;
+ idxNew = whereClauseInsert(pWC, pNew, TERM_VIRTUAL|TERM_DYNAMIC);
+ exprAnalyze(pSrc, pWC, idxNew);
+}
+
#if !defined(SQLITE_OMIT_OR_OPTIMIZATION) && !defined(SQLITE_OMIT_SUBQUERY)
/*
** Analyze a term that consists of two or more OR-connected
** (C) t1.x=t2.y OR (t1.x=t2.z AND t1.y=15)
** (D) x=expr1 OR (y>11 AND y<22 AND z LIKE '*hello*')
** (E) (p.a=1 AND q.b=2 AND r.c=3) OR (p.x=4 AND q.y=5 AND r.z=6)
+** (F) x>A OR (x=A AND y>=B)
**
** CASE 1:
**
**
** CASE 2:
**
+** If there is a two-way OR and one side has x>A and the other side
+** has x=A (for the same x and A) then add a new virtual term to the
+** WHERE clause of the form "x>=A".
+**
+** CASE 3:
+**
** If all subterms are indexable by a single table T, then set
**
** WhereTerm.eOperator = WO_OR
}
/*
- ** Record the set of tables that satisfy case 2. The set might be
+ ** Record the set of tables that satisfy case 3. The set might be
** empty.
*/
pOrInfo->indexable = indexable;
pTerm->eOperator = indexable==0 ? 0 : WO_OR;
+ /* For a two-way OR, attempt to implementation case 2.
+ */
+ if( indexable && pOrWc->nTerm==2 ){
+ int iOne = 0;
+ WhereTerm *pOne;
+ while( (pOne = whereNthSubterm(&pOrWc->a[0],iOne++))!=0 ){
+ int iTwo = 0;
+ WhereTerm *pTwo;
+ while( (pTwo = whereNthSubterm(&pOrWc->a[1],iTwo++))!=0 ){
+ whereCombineDisjuncts(pSrc, pWC, pOne, pTwo);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
/*
** chngToIN holds a set of tables that *might* satisfy case 1. But
** we have to do some additional checking to see if case 1 really
}else{
sqlite3ExprListDelete(db, pList);
}
- pTerm->eOperator = WO_NOOP; /* case 1 trumps case 2 */
+ pTerm->eOperator = WO_NOOP; /* case 1 trumps case 3 */
}
}
}
--- /dev/null
+# 2015-03-16
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+# May you do good and not evil.
+# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. The
+# focus of this file is testing OR expressions where terms can be
+# factored from either side of the OR and combined into a single new
+# AND term that is beneficial to the search. Examples:
+#
+# (x>A OR x=A) --> ... AND (x>=A)
+# (x>A OR (x=A AND y>=B) --> ... AND (x>=A)
+#
+
+
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+set ::testprefix whereD
+
+do_execsql_test 1.1 {
+ CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
+ WITH RECURSIVE c(x) AS (VALUES(0) UNION ALL SELECT x+1 FROM c WHERE x<99)
+ INSERT INTO t1(a,b,c) SELECT x, x/10, x%10 FROM c;
+ CREATE INDEX t1bc ON t1(b,c);
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>9 OR b=9 ORDER BY +a;
+} {90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99}
+do_execsql_test 1.1eqp {
+ EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>9 OR b=9 ORDER BY +a;
+} {/SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1bc/}
+
+do_execsql_test 1.2 {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>8 OR (b=8 AND c>7) ORDER BY +a;
+} {88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99}
+do_execsql_test 1.2eqp {
+ EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>8 OR (b=8 AND c>7) ORDER BY +a;
+} {/SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1bc/}
+
+do_execsql_test 1.3 {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE (b=8 AND c>7) OR b>8 ORDER BY +a;
+} {88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99}
+do_execsql_test 1.3eqp {
+ EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE (b=8 AND c>7) OR b>8 ORDER BY +a;
+} {/SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1bc/}
+
+do_execsql_test 1.4 {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE (b=8 AND c>7) OR 8<b ORDER BY +a;
+} {88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99}
+do_execsql_test 1.4eqp {
+ EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE (b=8 AND c>7) OR 8<b ORDER BY +a;
+} {/SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1bc/}
+
+do_execsql_test 1.5 {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE (b=8 AND c>7) OR (b>8 AND c NOT IN (4,5,6))
+ ORDER BY +a;
+} {88 89 90 91 92 93 97 98 99}
+do_execsql_test 1.5eqp {
+ EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE (b=8 AND c>7) OR (b>8 AND c NOT IN (4,5,6))
+ ORDER BY +a;
+} {/SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1bc/}
+
+finish_test