--- /dev/null
+From 8444d5c69549aa0f0b574cc608742d4669e1cc01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
+Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:02:28 -0400
+Subject: drm/radeon: update lockup tracking when scheduling in empty ring
+
+From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
+
+commit 8444d5c69549aa0f0b574cc608742d4669e1cc01 upstream.
+
+There might be issue with lockup detection when scheduling on an
+empty ring that have been sitting idle for a while. Thus update
+the lockup tracking data when scheduling new work in an empty ring.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
+Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
+Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
+Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c | 7 +++++++
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
+@@ -316,6 +316,13 @@ int radeon_ring_alloc(struct radeon_devi
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ /* Align requested size with padding so unlock_commit can
+ * pad safely */
++ radeon_ring_free_size(rdev, ring);
++ if (ring->ring_free_dw == (ring->ring_size / 4)) {
++ /* This is an empty ring update lockup info to avoid
++ * false positive.
++ */
++ radeon_ring_lockup_update(ring);
++ }
+ ndw = (ndw + ring->align_mask) & ~ring->align_mask;
+ while (ndw > (ring->ring_free_dw - 1)) {
+ radeon_ring_free_size(rdev, ring);