--- /dev/null
+From a7ab1c8b261305af583ce26bb4a14f555fdaa73e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:03:30 +0100
+Subject: mfd: 88pm860x: Fix I2C device resource leak on regmap init fail
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit a7ab1c8b261305af583ce26bb4a14f555fdaa73e upstream.
+
+During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C device for companion chip
+and then allocates a regmap for it. If regmap_init_i2c() fails then the
+I2C driver (allocated with i2c_new_dummy()) is not freed and this
+resource leaks.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
+@@ -1190,6 +1190,7 @@ static int pm860x_probe(struct i2c_clien
+ ret = PTR_ERR(chip->regmap_companion);
+ dev_err(&chip->companion->dev,
+ "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
++ i2c_unregister_device(chip->companion);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(chip->companion, chip);
--- /dev/null
+From 159ce52a6b777fc82fa0b51c7440e25f9e4c6feb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:03:29 +0100
+Subject: mfd: 88pm860x: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference on i2c_new_dummy error
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit 159ce52a6b777fc82fa0b51c7440e25f9e4c6feb upstream.
+
+During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C device for companion chip
+with i2c_new_dummy() but it does not check the return value of this call.
+
+In case of error (i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C
+address cannot be used) this function returns NULL which is later used
+by regmap_init_i2c().
+
+If i2c_new_dummy() fails for companion device, fail also the probe for
+main MFD driver.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c | 5 +++++
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
+@@ -1179,6 +1179,11 @@ static int pm860x_probe(struct i2c_clien
+ chip->companion_addr = pdata->companion_addr;
+ chip->companion = i2c_new_dummy(chip->client->adapter,
+ chip->companion_addr);
++ if (!chip->companion) {
++ dev_err(&client->dev,
++ "Failed to allocate I2C companion device\n");
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ chip->regmap_companion = regmap_init_i2c(chip->companion,
+ &pm860x_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(chip->regmap_companion)) {
--- /dev/null
+From b9e183a1d495cd65412abe0f9df19b151716bfe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:03:31 +0100
+Subject: mfd: max77686: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference on i2c_new_dummy error
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit b9e183a1d495cd65412abe0f9df19b151716bfe7 upstream.
+
+During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C device for RTC with
+i2c_new_dummy() but it does not check the return value of this call.
+
+In case of error (i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C
+address cannot be used) this function returns NULL which is later used
+by i2c_unregister_device().
+
+If i2c_new_dummy() fails for RTC device, fail also the probe for main
+MFD driver.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 4 ++++
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
+@@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c
+ dev_info(max77686->dev, "device found\n");
+
+ max77686->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_RTC);
++ if (!max77686->rtc) {
++ dev_err(max77686->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(max77686->rtc, max77686);
+
+ max77686_irq_init(max77686);
--- /dev/null
+From ad09dd6a1f5d6244bd89314015af506ba7f9810a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:03:32 +0100
+Subject: mfd: max77693: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference on i2c_new_dummy error
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit ad09dd6a1f5d6244bd89314015af506ba7f9810a upstream.
+
+During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C devices for MUIC and haptic
+with i2c_new_dummy() but it does not check the return value of this
+calls.
+
+In case of error (i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C
+address cannot be used) this function returns NULL which is later used
+by devm_regmap_init_i2c() and i2c_unregister_device().
+
+If i2c_new_dummy() fails for MUIC or haptic devices, fail also the probe
+for main MFD driver.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 12 +++++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
+@@ -149,9 +149,18 @@ static int max77693_i2c_probe(struct i2c
+ dev_info(max77693->dev, "device ID: 0x%x\n", reg_data);
+
+ max77693->muic = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_MUIC);
++ if (!max77693->muic) {
++ dev_err(max77693->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for MUIC\n");
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(max77693->muic, max77693);
+
+ max77693->haptic = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_HAPTIC);
++ if (!max77693->haptic) {
++ dev_err(max77693->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for Haptic\n");
++ ret = -ENODEV;
++ goto err_i2c_haptic;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(max77693->haptic, max77693);
+
+ /*
+@@ -187,8 +196,9 @@ err_mfd:
+ max77693_irq_exit(max77693);
+ err_irq:
+ err_regmap_muic:
+- i2c_unregister_device(max77693->muic);
+ i2c_unregister_device(max77693->haptic);
++err_i2c_haptic:
++ i2c_unregister_device(max77693->muic);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
--- /dev/null
+From 96cf3dedc491d2f1f66cc26217f2b06b0c7b6797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:03:33 +0100
+Subject: mfd: max8925: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference on i2c_new_dummy error
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit 96cf3dedc491d2f1f66cc26217f2b06b0c7b6797 upstream.
+
+During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C devices for RTC and ADC
+with i2c_new_dummy() but it does not check the return value of this
+calls.
+
+In case of error (i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C
+address cannot be used) this function returns NULL which is later used
+by i2c_unregister_device().
+
+If i2c_new_dummy() fails for RTC or ADC devices, fail also the probe
+for main MFD driver.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/max8925-i2c.c | 9 +++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/max8925-i2c.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/max8925-i2c.c
+@@ -180,9 +180,18 @@ static int max8925_probe(struct i2c_clie
+ mutex_init(&chip->io_lock);
+
+ chip->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(chip->i2c->adapter, RTC_I2C_ADDR);
++ if (!chip->rtc) {
++ dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(chip->rtc, chip);
+
+ chip->adc = i2c_new_dummy(chip->i2c->adapter, ADC_I2C_ADDR);
++ if (!chip->adc) {
++ dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for ADC\n");
++ i2c_unregister_device(chip->rtc);
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(chip->adc, chip);
+
+ device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 1);
--- /dev/null
+From 97dc4ed3fa377ec91bb60ba98b70d645c2099384 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:03:34 +0100
+Subject: mfd: max8997: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference on i2c_new_dummy error
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit 97dc4ed3fa377ec91bb60ba98b70d645c2099384 upstream.
+
+During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C devices for RTC, haptic and
+MUIC with i2c_new_dummy() but it does not check the return value of this
+calls.
+
+In case of error (i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C
+address cannot be used) this function returns NULL which is later used
+by i2c_unregister_device().
+
+If i2c_new_dummy() fails for RTC, haptic or MUIC devices, fail also the
+probe for main MFD driver.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/max8997.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/max8997.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/max8997.c
+@@ -218,10 +218,26 @@ static int max8997_i2c_probe(struct i2c_
+ mutex_init(&max8997->iolock);
+
+ max8997->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_RTC);
++ if (!max8997->rtc) {
++ dev_err(max8997->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(max8997->rtc, max8997);
++
+ max8997->haptic = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_HAPTIC);
++ if (!max8997->haptic) {
++ dev_err(max8997->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for Haptic\n");
++ ret = -ENODEV;
++ goto err_i2c_haptic;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(max8997->haptic, max8997);
++
+ max8997->muic = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_MUIC);
++ if (!max8997->muic) {
++ dev_err(max8997->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for MUIC\n");
++ ret = -ENODEV;
++ goto err_i2c_muic;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(max8997->muic, max8997);
+
+ pm_runtime_set_active(max8997->dev);
+@@ -248,7 +264,9 @@ static int max8997_i2c_probe(struct i2c_
+ err_mfd:
+ mfd_remove_devices(max8997->dev);
+ i2c_unregister_device(max8997->muic);
++err_i2c_muic:
+ i2c_unregister_device(max8997->haptic);
++err_i2c_haptic:
+ i2c_unregister_device(max8997->rtc);
+ err:
+ kfree(max8997);
--- /dev/null
+From ed26f87b9f71693a1d1ee85f5e6209601505080f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:03:35 +0100
+Subject: mfd: max8998: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference on i2c_new_dummy error
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit ed26f87b9f71693a1d1ee85f5e6209601505080f upstream.
+
+During probe the driver allocates dummy I2C device for RTC with i2c_new_dummy() but it does not check the return value of this call.
+
+In case of error (i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C
+address cannot be used) this function returns NULL which is later used
+by i2c_unregister_device().
+
+If i2c_new_dummy() fails for RTC device, fail also the probe for
+main MFD driver.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/max8998.c | 4 ++++
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/max8998.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/max8998.c
+@@ -152,6 +152,10 @@ static int max8998_i2c_probe(struct i2c_
+ mutex_init(&max8998->iolock);
+
+ max8998->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, RTC_I2C_ADDR);
++ if (!max8998->rtc) {
++ dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(max8998->rtc, max8998);
+
+ max8998_irq_init(max8998);
--- /dev/null
+From 65aba1e04916d72b30c028730a1e31860c225412 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:12:25 +0100
+Subject: mfd: sec-core: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference when i2c_new_dummy error
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit 65aba1e04916d72b30c028730a1e31860c225412 upstream.
+
+During probe the sec-core driver allocates dummy I2C device for RTC with
+i2c_new_dummy() but return value is not checked. In case of error
+(i2c_new_device(): memory allocation failure or I2C address cannot be
+used) this function returns NULL which is later used by
+devm_regmap_init_i2c() or i2c_unregister_device().
+
+If i2c_new_dummy() fails for RTC device, fail also the probe for main
+MFD driver.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 4 ++++
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
+@@ -199,6 +199,10 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_cli
+ }
+
+ sec_pmic->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, RTC_I2C_ADDR);
++ if (!sec_pmic->rtc) {
++ dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C for RTC\n");
++ return -ENODEV;
++ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(sec_pmic->rtc, sec_pmic);
+
+ if (pdata && pdata->cfg_pmic_irq)
--- /dev/null
+From 483e2dfdbc94751430e41db9973985f5b054d322 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:50:44 +0100
+Subject: mfd: tps65910: Fix possible invalid pointer dereference on regmap_add_irq_chip fail
+
+From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+
+commit 483e2dfdbc94751430e41db9973985f5b054d322 upstream.
+
+Fixes: 4aab3fadad32 ("mfd: tps65910: Move interrupt implementation code to mfd file")
+
+tps65910_irq_init() sets 'tps65910->chip_irq' before calling
+regmap_add_irq_chip(). If the regmap_add_irq_chip() call fails in
+memory allocation of regmap_irq_chip_data members then:
+
+1. The 'tps65910->chip_irq' will still hold some value
+2. 'tps65910->irq_data' will be pointing to already freed memory
+ (because regmap_add_irq_chip() will free it on error)
+
+This results in invalid memory access during driver remove because the
+tps65910_irq_exit() tests whether 'tps65910->chip_irq' is not zero.
+
+Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
+Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 4 +++-
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
++++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
+@@ -254,8 +254,10 @@ static int tps65910_irq_init(struct tps6
+ ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(tps65910->regmap, tps65910->chip_irq,
+ IRQF_ONESHOT, pdata->irq_base,
+ tps6591x_irqs_chip, &tps65910->irq_data);
+- if (ret < 0)
++ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_warn(tps65910->dev, "Failed to add irq_chip %d\n", ret);
++ tps65910->chip_irq = 0;
++ }
+ return ret;
+ }
+
alsa-hda-realtek-add-support-of-alc288-codec.patch
s390-cio-fix-driver-callback-initialization-for-ccw-consoles.patch
mei-me-do-not-load-the-driver-if-the-fw-doesn-t-support-mei-interface.patch
+mfd-sec-core-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-when-i2c_new_dummy-error.patch
+mfd-88pm860x-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-on-i2c_new_dummy-error.patch
+mfd-88pm860x-fix-i2c-device-resource-leak-on-regmap-init-fail.patch
+mfd-max77686-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-on-i2c_new_dummy-error.patch
+mfd-max77693-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-on-i2c_new_dummy-error.patch
+mfd-max8925-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-on-i2c_new_dummy-error.patch
+mfd-max8998-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-on-i2c_new_dummy-error.patch
+mfd-max8997-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference-on-i2c_new_dummy-error.patch
+mfd-tps65910-fix-possible-invalid-pointer-dereference-on-regmap_add_irq_chip-fail.patch
+w1-fix-w1_send_slave-dropping-a-slave-id.patch
+staging-serqt_usb2-fix-sparse-warning-restricted-__le16-degrades-to-integer.patch
--- /dev/null
+From abe5d64d1a74195a44cd14624f8178b9f48b7cc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:59:57 +0530
+Subject: staging:serqt_usb2: Fix sparse warning restricted __le16 degrades to integer
+
+From: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
+
+commit abe5d64d1a74195a44cd14624f8178b9f48b7cc7 upstream.
+
+This patch fixes the following sparse warning :
+drivers/staging/serqt_usb2/serqt_usb2.c:727:40: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer
+
+Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/staging/serqt_usb2/serqt_usb2.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/staging/serqt_usb2/serqt_usb2.c
++++ b/drivers/staging/serqt_usb2/serqt_usb2.c
+@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static int qt_startup(struct usb_serial
+ goto startup_error;
+ }
+
+- switch (serial->dev->descriptor.idProduct) {
++ switch (le16_to_cpu(serial->dev->descriptor.idProduct)) {
+ case QUATECH_DSU100:
+ case QUATECH_QSU100:
+ case QUATECH_ESU100A:
--- /dev/null
+From 6b355b33a64fd6d8ead2b838ec16fb9b551f71e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: David Fries <David@Fries.net>
+Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:29:12 -0600
+Subject: w1: fix w1_send_slave dropping a slave id
+
+From: David Fries <David@Fries.net>
+
+commit 6b355b33a64fd6d8ead2b838ec16fb9b551f71e8 upstream.
+
+Previous logic,
+if (avail > 8) {
+ store slave;
+ return;
+}
+send data; clear;
+
+The logic error is, if there isn't space send the buffer and clear,
+but the slave wasn't added to the now empty buffer loosing that slave
+id. It also should have been "if (avail >= 8)" because when it is 8,
+there is space.
+
+Instead, if there isn't space send and clear the buffer, then there is
+always space for the slave id.
+
+Signed-off-by: David Fries <David@Fries.net>
+Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
+ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
++++ b/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
+@@ -54,28 +54,29 @@ static void w1_send_slave(struct w1_mast
+ struct w1_netlink_msg *hdr = (struct w1_netlink_msg *)(msg + 1);
+ struct w1_netlink_cmd *cmd = (struct w1_netlink_cmd *)(hdr + 1);
+ int avail;
++ u64 *data;
+
+ /* update kernel slave list */
+ w1_slave_found(dev, rn);
+
+ avail = dev->priv_size - cmd->len;
+
+- if (avail > 8) {
+- u64 *data = (void *)(cmd + 1) + cmd->len;
+-
+- *data = rn;
+- cmd->len += 8;
+- hdr->len += 8;
+- msg->len += 8;
+- return;
++ if (avail < 8) {
++ msg->ack++;
++ cn_netlink_send(msg, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
++
++ msg->len = sizeof(struct w1_netlink_msg) +
++ sizeof(struct w1_netlink_cmd);
++ hdr->len = sizeof(struct w1_netlink_cmd);
++ cmd->len = 0;
+ }
+
+- msg->ack++;
+- cn_netlink_send(msg, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
++ data = (void *)(cmd + 1) + cmd->len;
+
+- msg->len = sizeof(struct w1_netlink_msg) + sizeof(struct w1_netlink_cmd);
+- hdr->len = sizeof(struct w1_netlink_cmd);
+- cmd->len = 0;
++ *data = rn;
++ cmd->len += 8;
++ hdr->len += 8;
++ msg->len += 8;
+ }
+
+ static int w1_process_search_command(struct w1_master *dev, struct cn_msg *msg,