I've been reviewing all uses of PyObject_IsInstance, and I believe
that the use of PyObject_IsInstance in py-unwind.c is not entirely
correct. The use of PyObject_IsInstance is in this code in
frame_unwind_python::sniff:
if (PyObject_IsInstance (pyo_unwind_info,
(PyObject *) &unwind_info_object_type) <= 0)
error (_("A Unwinder should return gdb.UnwindInfo instance."));
The problem is that PyObject_IsInstance can return -1 to indicate an
error, in which case a Python error will have been set. Now, the
above code appears to handle this case, it checks for '<= 0', however,
frame_unwind_python::sniff has this near the start:
gdbpy_enter enter_py (gdbarch);
And looking in python.c at 'gdbpy_enter::~gdbpy_enter ()', you'll
notice that if an error is set then the error is printed, but also, we
get a warning about an unhandled Python exception. Clearly, all
exceptions should have been handled by the time the gdbpy_enter
destructor is called.
I've added a test as part of this commit that exposes this problem,
the current output is:
(gdb) backtrace
Python Exception <class 'RuntimeError'>: error in Blah.__class__
warning: internal error: Unhandled Python exception
Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: A Unwinder should return gdb.UnwindInfo instance.
#0 corrupt_frame_inner () at /home/andrew/projects/binutils-gdb/build.dev-g/gdb/testsuite/../../../src.dev-g/gdb/test>
(gdb)
An additional observation is that we use PyObject_IsInstance to check
that the return value is a gdb.UnwindInfo, or a sub-class. However,
gdb.UnwindInfo lacks the Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE flag, and so cannot be
sub-classed. As such, PyObject_IsInstance is not really needed, we
could use PyObject_TypeCheck instead. The PyObject_TypeCheck function
only returns 0 or 1, there is no -1 error case. Switching to
PyObject_TypeCheck then, fixes the above problem.
There's a new test that exposes the problems that originally existed.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
/* Received UnwindInfo, cache data. */
PyObject *pyo_unwind_info = PyTuple_GET_ITEM (pyo_execute_ret.get (), 0);
- if (PyObject_IsInstance (pyo_unwind_info,
- (PyObject *) &unwind_info_object_type) <= 0)
- error (_("A Unwinder should return gdb.UnwindInfo instance."));
+ if (!PyObject_TypeCheck (pyo_unwind_info, &unwind_info_object_type))
+ error (_("an Unwinder should return gdb.UnwindInfo, not %s."),
+ Py_TYPE (pyo_unwind_info)->tp_name);
{
unwind_info_object *unwind_info =
"Python Exception <class 'ValueError'>: invalid literal for int\\(\\) with base 10: 'xyz'\r\n.*"
}
+with_test_prefix "bad object unwinder" {
+ gdb_test_no_output "python obj = bad_object_unwinder(\"bad-object\")"
+ gdb_test_no_output "python gdb.unwinder.register_unwinder(None, obj, replace=True)"
+ gdb_test "backtrace" \
+ "Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: an Unwinder should return gdb.UnwindInfo, not Blah\\.\r\n.*"
+}
+
# Gather information about every frame.
gdb_test_no_output "python capture_all_frame_information()"
gdb_test_no_output "python gdb.newest_frame().select()"
return None
+class bad_object_unwinder(Unwinder):
+ def __init__(self, name):
+ super().__init__(name)
+
+ def __call__(self, pending_frame):
+
+ if pending_frame.level() != 1:
+ return None
+
+ class Blah:
+ def __init__(self):
+ pass
+
+ @property
+ def __class__(self):
+ raise RuntimeError("error in Blah.__class__")
+
+ return Blah()
+
+
print("Python script imported")