The memory barriers in list_del_init_careful() and list_empty_careful()
in pairs already handle the proper ordering between data.got_token
and data.wq.entry. So remove the redundant explicit barriers. And also
change a "break" statement to "return" to avoid redundant calling of
finish_wait().
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021085251.73353-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
return -1;
data->got_token = true;
- smp_wmb();
wake_up_process(data->task);
list_del_init_careful(&curr->entry);
return 1;
* which means we now have two. Put our local token
* and wake anyone else potentially waiting for one.
*/
- smp_rmb();
if (data.got_token)
cleanup_cb(rqw, private_data);
- break;
+ return;
}
io_schedule();
has_sleeper = true;