Problem: Filler lines not checked properly in get_scroll_overlap().
Solution: Add missing parentheses (zeertzjq).
The missing parentheses causes the second argument to diff_check_fill()
to always be 0 as it is the result of a comparison between a positive
integer and -1 (the value of BACKWARD), in which case diff_check_fill()
always returns 0 instead of the number of filler lines above a line.
It's very hard to add a test for this, because this mistake at most
leads to 2 screen lines of difference in scrolling behavior, and in
cases where it may indeed lead to a difference in behavior, neither
behavior achieves complete symmetry between CTRL-F and CTRL-B.
closes: #14527
Signed-off-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
loff.lnum = dir == FORWARD ? curwin->w_botline : curwin->w_topline - 1;
#ifdef FEAT_DIFF
- loff.fill = diff_check_fill(curwin, loff.lnum + dir == BACKWARD)
+ loff.fill = diff_check_fill(curwin, loff.lnum + (dir == BACKWARD))
- (dir == FORWARD ? curwin->w_filler_rows : curwin->w_topfill);
loff.height = loff.fill > 0 ? 1 : plines_nofill(loff.lnum);
#else
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+ 310,
/**/
309,
/**/