There are some inconsistencies with how different asciidoc environments
handle different combinations of "\{<>}", e.g. these results were
observed with asciidoc on two different environments:
| Input | Output (env A) | Output (env B) | same/different |
|-----------+----------------+------------------+----------------|
| \{<foo>\} | {<foo>} | \{<foo>}^M | different |
| {<foo>} | {<foo>} | {<foo>} | same |
| \{<foo>} | {<foo>} | \{<foo>}^M | different |
| \{foo\} | {foo} | {foo} | same |
| \{\} | {} | \{}^M | different |
| \{} | {} | {} | same |
| {\} | {} | {} | same |
The only instance of this biting us is "@\{<specifier>\}" in
Documentation/git-reflog.txt; all other combinations of "\{<>}" (e.g. in
Documentation/revisions.txt) seem to render consistently.
Fix this inconsistent rendering by removing the unnecessary "\" in
Documentation/git-reflog.txt.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
[--rewrite] [--updateref] [--stale-fix]
[--dry-run | -n] [--verbose] [--all [--single-worktree] | <refs>...]
'git reflog delete' [--rewrite] [--updateref]
- [--dry-run | -n] [--verbose] <ref>@\{<specifier>\}...
+ [--dry-run | -n] [--verbose] <ref>@{<specifier>}...
'git reflog exists' <ref>
Reference logs, or "reflogs", record when the tips of branches and