The way it was worded, the %u placeholder could be read as the table
OID. Rearrange slightly to avoid the possible confusion.
Reported-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxFx-25XQV%2Br23oku7ZnL958P30hyb9cFeYPv6wv7yzCCw%40mail.gmail.com
if (RelationGetDescr(ctx->rel)->natts < ctx->natts)
{
report_corruption(ctx,
- psprintf("number of attributes %u exceeds maximum expected for table %u",
+ psprintf("number of attributes %u exceeds maximum %u expected for table",
ctx->natts,
RelationGetDescr(ctx->rel)->natts));
return;
$tup->{t_infomask2} |= HEAP_NATTS_MASK;
push @expected,
- qr/${$header}number of attributes 2047 exceeds maximum expected for table 3/;
+ qr/${$header}number of attributes 2047 exceeds maximum 3 expected for table/;
}
elsif ($offnum == 10)
{
$tup->{t_hoff} = 32;
push @expected,
- qr/${$header}number of attributes 67 exceeds maximum expected for table 3/;
+ qr/${$header}number of attributes 67 exceeds maximum 3 expected for table/;
}
elsif ($offnum == 12)
{