--- /dev/null
+From a580fb2c3479d993556e1c31b237c9e5be4944a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
+Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 14:12:10 -0400
+Subject: btrfs: don't BUG_ON on ENOMEM from btrfs_lookup_extent_info() in walk_down_proc()
+
+From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
+
+commit a580fb2c3479d993556e1c31b237c9e5be4944a3 upstream.
+
+We handle errors here properly, ENOMEM isn't fatal, return the error.
+
+Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
+Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Keerthana K <keerthana.kalyanasundaram@broadcom.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 1 -
+ 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
++++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+@@ -4878,7 +4878,6 @@ static noinline int walk_down_proc(struc
+ eb->start, level, 1,
+ &wc->refs[level],
+ &wc->flags[level]);
+- BUG_ON(ret == -ENOMEM);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ if (unlikely(wc->refs[level] == 0)) {
dm-thin-add-missing-destroy_work_on_stack.patch
nfsd-make-sure-exp-active-before-svc_export_show.patch
nfsd-fix-nfs4_openowner-leak-when-concurrent-nfsd4_open-occur.patch
+btrfs-don-t-bug_on-on-enomem-from-btrfs_lookup_extent_info-in-walk_down_proc.patch