+2002-06-22 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
+
+ * NEWS: Mention below.
+
+ Merge from mainline:
+ 2002-05-12 Fred Fish <fnf@redhat.com>:
+ * symfile.c (default_symfile_offsets): Arrange for uninitialized
+ sect_index_xxx members to index the first slot in section_offsets
+ if all of the section_offsets are zero.
+
2002-06-20 Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
* event-top.c (command_handler): Don't use space_at_cmd_start
mdebugread.c:2443: gdb-internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized
Fix, by Joel Brobecker imported from mainline.
+gdb/439: gdb/291: On some ELF object files, gdb was reporting:
+dwarf2read.c:1072: gdb-internal-error: sect_index_text not initialize
+Fix, by Fred Fish, imported from mainline.
+
*** Changes in GDB 5.2:
* New command "set trust-readonly-sections on[off]".
if (sect)
objfile->sect_index_rodata = sect->index;
+ /* This is where things get really weird... We MUST have valid
+ indices for the various sect_index_* members or gdb will abort.
+ So if for example, there is no ".text" section, we have to
+ accomodate that. Except when explicitly adding symbol files at
+ some address, section_offsets contains nothing but zeros, so it
+ doesn't matter which slot in section_offsets the individual
+ sect_index_* members index into. So if they are all zero, it is
+ safe to just point all the currently uninitialized indices to the
+ first slot. */
+
+ for (i = 0; i < objfile->num_sections; i++)
+ {
+ if (ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, i) != 0)
+ {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (i == objfile->num_sections)
+ {
+ if (objfile->sect_index_text == -1)
+ objfile->sect_index_text = 0;
+ if (objfile->sect_index_data == -1)
+ objfile->sect_index_data = 0;
+ if (objfile->sect_index_bss == -1)
+ objfile->sect_index_bss = 0;
+ if (objfile->sect_index_rodata == -1)
+ objfile->sect_index_rodata = 0;
+ }
}
/* Process a symbol file, as either the main file or as a dynamically