--- /dev/null
+From 8e1ac4299a6e8726de42310d9c1379f188140c71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:12:01 +0000
+Subject: sched/fair: Fix overutilized update in enqueue_task_fair()
+
+From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+
+commit 8e1ac4299a6e8726de42310d9c1379f188140c71 upstream.
+
+enqueue_task_fair() attempts to skip the overutilized update for new
+tasks as their util_avg is not accurate yet. However, the flag we check
+to do so is overwritten earlier on in the function, which makes the
+condition pretty much a nop.
+
+Fix this by saving the flag early on.
+
+Fixes: 2802bf3cd936 ("sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator")
+Reported-by: Rick Yiu <rickyiu@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
+Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
+Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112111201.2081902-1-qperret@google.com
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 ++-
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
++++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
+@@ -5228,6 +5228,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+ struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+ int idle_h_nr_running = task_has_idle_policy(p);
++ int task_new = !(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
+
+ /*
+ * The code below (indirectly) updates schedutil which looks at
+@@ -5299,7 +5300,7 @@ enqueue_throttle:
+ * into account, but that is not straightforward to implement,
+ * and the following generally works well enough in practice.
+ */
+- if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
++ if (!task_new)
+ update_overutilized_status(rq);
+
+ }