Some 'creative' VMMs out there may assign a VFIO MSI eventfd to an SPI
routing entry.
And yes, I can already hear you shouting about possibly driving a level
interrupt with an edge-sensitive one. You know who you are.
This works for the most part, and interrupt injection winds up taking
the software path. However, when running on GICv4-enabled hardware, KVM
erroneously attempts to setup LPI forwarding, even though the KVM
routing isn't an MSI.
Thanks to misuse of a union, the MSI destination is unlikely to match any
ITS in the VM and kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding() bails early. Later on when
the VM is being torn down, this half-configured state triggers the
WARN_ON() in kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding() due to the fact that no HW
IRQ was ever assigned.
Avoid the whole mess by preventing SPI routing entries from getting into
the LPI forwarding helpers.
Reported-by: Sudheer Dantuluri <dantuluris@google.com>
Tested-by: Sudheer Dantuluri <dantuluris@google.com>
Fixes: 196b136498b3 ("KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Wire mapping/unmapping of VLPIs in VFIO irq bypass")
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226183124.82094-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
{
struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+ struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry = &irqfd->irq_entry;
+
+ /*
+ * The only thing we have a chance of directly-injecting is LPIs. Maybe
+ * one day...
+ */
+ if (irq_entry->type != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
+ return 0;
return kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
&irqfd->irq_entry);
{
struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+ struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry = &irqfd->irq_entry;
+
+ if (irq_entry->type != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
+ return;
kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
&irqfd->irq_entry);