The following testcase revealed a typo in condition, as the comment
says the intent is
/* If lhs of stmt is large/huge _BitInt SSA_NAME not in m_names
it means it will be handled in a loop or straight line code
at the location of its (ultimate) immediate use, so for
vop checking purposes check these only at the ultimate
immediate use. */
but the condition was using != BITINT_TYPE rather than == BITINT_TYPE,
so e.g. it used bitint_precision_kind on non-BITINT_TYPEs (e.g. on vector
types it will crash because TYPE_PRECISION means something different there,
or on say INTEGER_TYPEs the precision will never be large enough to be >=
bitint_prec_large).
The following patch fixes that.
2024-01-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/113323
* gimple-lower-bitint.cc (bitint_dom_walker::before_dom_children): Fix
check for lhs being large/huge _BitInt not in m_names.
* gcc.dg/bitint-68.c: New test.
tree lhs = gimple_get_lhs (stmt);
if (lhs
&& TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME
- && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs)) != BITINT_TYPE
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs)) == BITINT_TYPE
&& bitint_precision_kind (TREE_TYPE (lhs)) >= bitint_prec_large
&& !bitmap_bit_p (m_names, SSA_NAME_VERSION (lhs)))
/* If lhs of stmt is large/huge _BitInt SSA_NAME not in m_names,
--- /dev/null
+/* PR tree-optimization/113323 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target bitint575 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23 -O2" } */
+
+typedef long __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
+V u, v;
+_BitInt(535) i;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ while (i)
+ u = v;
+}