Tony Ho noticed a too-strict check in xt_recent, so here is a fix.
Reported-by: Tony Ho <iptables@iblink.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
"recent: you must specify one of `--set', `--rcheck' "
"`--update' or `--remove'");
if ((flags & IPT_RECENT_TTL) &&
- (flags & (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE | IPT_RECENT_UPDATE)))
+ (flags & (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE)))
exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
"recent: --rttl may only be used with --rcheck or "
"--update");
number of hits within a specific time frame.
.TP
\fB--rttl\fR
-This option must be used in conjunction with one of \fB--rcheck\fR or
+This option may only be used in conjunction with one of \fB--rcheck\fR or
\fB--update\fR. When used, this will narrow the match to only happen
when the address is in the list and the TTL of the current packet
matches that of the packet which hit the \fB--set\fR rule. This may be