--- /dev/null
+From 8caa81eb950cb2e9d2d6959b37d853162d197f57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: =?UTF-8?q?Uwe=20Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
+Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 22:45:44 +0100
+Subject: pwm: meson: Explicitly set .polarity in .get_state()
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
+
+commit 8caa81eb950cb2e9d2d6959b37d853162d197f57 upstream.
+
+The driver only supports normal polarity. Complete the implementation of
+.get_state() by setting .polarity accordingly.
+
+This fixes a regression that was possible since commit c73a3107624d
+("pwm: Handle .get_state() failures") which stopped to zero-initialize
+the state passed to the .get_state() callback. This was reported at
+https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=177&t=46360 . While this was an
+unintended side effect, the real issue is the driver's callback not
+setting the polarity.
+
+There is a complicating fact, that the .apply() callback fakes support
+for inversed polarity. This is not (and cannot) be matched by
+.get_state(). As fixing this isn't easy, only point it out in a comment
+to prevent authors of other drivers from copying that approach.
+
+Fixes: c375bcbaabdb ("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()")
+Reported-by: Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@amazon.com>
+Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310191405.2606296-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
+Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
+Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 8 ++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
++++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
+@@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_p
+ duty = state->duty_cycle;
+ period = state->period;
+
++ /*
++ * Note this is wrong. The result is an output wave that isn't really
++ * inverted and so is wrongly identified by .get_state as normal.
++ * Fixing this needs some care however as some machines might rely on
++ * this.
++ */
+ if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
+ duty = period - duty;
+
+@@ -304,6 +310,8 @@ static int meson_pwm_apply(struct pwm_ch
+ meson_pwm_enable(meson, pwm);
+ }
+
++ state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
++
+ return 0;
+ }
+