md.texi (Processor pipeline description): Fix typo in example of how to use the absen...

* doc/md.texi (Processor pipeline description): Fix typo in
  example of how to use the absence_set directive and reword the
  description to make it slightly easier to read.

From-SVN: r116973

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index afcb7d2afb7e4e1e29b6ba7f31c20d20dc524920..9c5d8ffaaa589372a4a9fdbd2a899721ad8f0585 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2006-09-15  Nick Clifton  <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+       * doc/md.texi (Processor pipeline description): Fix typo in
+       example of how to use the absence_set directive and reword the
+       description to make it slightly easier to read.
+
 2005-09-15  Bernd Schmidt  <bernd.schmidt@analog.com>
 
        * params.def (PARAM_MAX_ITERATIONS_COMPUTATION_COST): New.

diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
index 60ad8bc3f21047409fb24415b2160cade2895c3a..1fd7262aac3b4b62853915c3e4027e120ef7607f 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
@@ -6933,13 +6933,13 @@ The forth construction (@samp{absence_set}) means that each functional
 unit in the first string can be reserved only if each pattern of units
 whose names are in the second string is not reserved.  This is an
 asymmetric relation (actually @samp{exclusion_set} is analogous to
-this one but it is symmetric).  For example, it is useful for
-description that @acronym{VLIW} @samp{slot0} can not be reserved after
-@samp{slot1} or @samp{slot2} reservation.  We could describe it by the
-following construction
+this one but it is symmetric).  For example it might be useful in a 
+@acronym{VLIW} description to say that @samp{slot0} cannot be reserved
+after either @samp{slot1} or @samp{slot2} have been reserved.  This
+can be described as:
 
 @smallexample
-(absence_set "slot2" "slot0, slot1")
+(absence_set "slot0" "slot1, slot2")
 @end smallexample
 
 Or @samp{slot2} can not be reserved if @samp{slot0} and unit @samp{b0}