--- /dev/null
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Resilient Queued Spin Lock
+ *
+ * (C) Copyright 2013-2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
+ * (C) Copyright 2013-2014,2018 Red Hat, Inc.
+ * (C) Copyright 2015 Intel Corp.
+ * (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP
+ *
+ * Authors: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+ * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
+ */
+
+#ifndef _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH
+
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/prefetch.h>
+#include <asm/byteorder.h>
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
+#include <trace/events/lock.h>
+
+/*
+ * Include queued spinlock definitions and statistics code
+ */
+#include "../locking/qspinlock.h"
+#include "../locking/qspinlock_stat.h"
+
+/*
+ * The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood
+ * by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the
+ * MCS lock. A copy of the original MCS lock paper ("Algorithms for Scalable
+ * Synchronization on Shared-Memory Multiprocessors by Mellor-Crummey and
+ * Scott") is available at
+ *
+ * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206115
+ *
+ * This queued spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock, however to
+ * make it fit the 4 bytes we assume spinlock_t to be, and preserve its
+ * existing API, we must modify it somehow.
+ *
+ * In particular; where the traditional MCS lock consists of a tail pointer
+ * (8 bytes) and needs the next pointer (another 8 bytes) of its own node to
+ * unlock the next pending (next->locked), we compress both these: {tail,
+ * next->locked} into a single u32 value.
+ *
+ * Since a spinlock disables recursion of its own context and there is a limit
+ * to the contexts that can nest; namely: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi. As there
+ * are at most 4 nesting levels, it can be encoded by a 2-bit number. Now
+ * we can encode the tail by combining the 2-bit nesting level with the cpu
+ * number. With one byte for the lock value and 3 bytes for the tail, only a
+ * 32-bit word is now needed. Even though we only need 1 bit for the lock,
+ * we extend it to a full byte to achieve better performance for architectures
+ * that support atomic byte write.
+ *
+ * We also change the first spinner to spin on the lock bit instead of its
+ * node; whereby avoiding the need to carry a node from lock to unlock, and
+ * preserving existing lock API. This also makes the unlock code simpler and
+ * faster.
+ *
+ * N.B. The current implementation only supports architectures that allow
+ * atomic operations on smaller 8-bit and 16-bit data types.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include "../locking/mcs_spinlock.h"
+
+/*
+ * Per-CPU queue node structures; we can never have more than 4 nested
+ * contexts: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi.
+ *
+ * Exactly fits one 64-byte cacheline on a 64-bit architecture.
+ *
+ * PV doubles the storage and uses the second cacheline for PV state.
+ */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, rqnodes[_Q_MAX_NODES]);
+
+/*
+ * Generate the native code for resilient_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(); provide NOPs
+ * for all the PV callbacks.
+ */
+
+static __always_inline void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
+static __always_inline void __pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node,
+ struct mcs_spinlock *prev) { }
+static __always_inline void __pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock,
+ struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
+static __always_inline u32 __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
+ struct mcs_spinlock *node)
+ { return 0; }
+
+#define pv_enabled() false
+
+#define pv_init_node __pv_init_node
+#define pv_wait_node __pv_wait_node
+#define pv_kick_node __pv_kick_node
+#define pv_wait_head_or_lock __pv_wait_head_or_lock
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
+#define resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath native_resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */
+
+/**
+ * resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queued spinlock
+ * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
+ * @val: Current value of the queued spinlock 32-bit word
+ *
+ * (queue tail, pending bit, lock value)
+ *
+ * fast : slow : unlock
+ * : :
+ * uncontended (0,0,0) -:--> (0,0,1) ------------------------------:--> (*,*,0)
+ * : | ^--------.------. / :
+ * : v \ \ | :
+ * pending : (0,1,1) +--> (0,1,0) \ | :
+ * : | ^--' | | :
+ * : v | | :
+ * uncontended : (n,x,y) +--> (n,0,0) --' | :
+ * queue : | ^--' | :
+ * : v | :
+ * contended : (*,x,y) +--> (*,0,0) ---> (*,0,1) -' :
+ * queue : ^--' :
+ */
+void __lockfunc resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+ struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
+ u32 old, tail;
+ int idx;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));
+
+ if (pv_enabled())
+ goto pv_queue;
+
+ if (virt_spin_lock(lock))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs with a bounded
+ * number of spins so that we guarantee forward progress.
+ *
+ * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
+ */
+ if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) {
+ int cnt = _Q_PENDING_LOOPS;
+ val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->val,
+ (VAL != _Q_PENDING_VAL) || !cnt--);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If we observe any contention; queue.
+ */
+ if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+ goto queue;
+
+ /*
+ * trylock || pending
+ *
+ * 0,0,* -> 0,1,* -> 0,0,1 pending, trylock
+ */
+ val = queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(lock);
+
+ /*
+ * If we observe contention, there is a concurrent locker.
+ *
+ * Undo and queue; our setting of PENDING might have made the
+ * n,0,0 -> 0,0,0 transition fail and it will now be waiting
+ * on @next to become !NULL.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)) {
+
+ /* Undo PENDING if we set it. */
+ if (!(val & _Q_PENDING_MASK))
+ clear_pending(lock);
+
+ goto queue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
+ *
+ * 0,1,1 -> *,1,0
+ *
+ * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
+ * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
+ * sequentiality; this is because not all
+ * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full
+ * barriers.
+ */
+ if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->locked, !VAL);
+
+ /*
+ * take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ *
+ * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
+ */
+ clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
+ lockevent_inc(lock_pending);
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * End of pending bit optimistic spinning and beginning of MCS
+ * queuing.
+ */
+queue:
+ lockevent_inc(lock_slowpath);
+pv_queue:
+ node = this_cpu_ptr(&rqnodes[0].mcs);
+ idx = node->count++;
+ tail = encode_tail(smp_processor_id(), idx);
+
+ trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_SPIN);
+
+ /*
+ * 4 nodes are allocated based on the assumption that there will
+ * not be nested NMIs taking spinlocks. That may not be true in
+ * some architectures even though the chance of needing more than
+ * 4 nodes will still be extremely unlikely. When that happens,
+ * we fall back to spinning on the lock directly without using
+ * any MCS node. This is not the most elegant solution, but is
+ * simple enough.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(idx >= _Q_MAX_NODES)) {
+ lockevent_inc(lock_no_node);
+ while (!queued_spin_trylock(lock))
+ cpu_relax();
+ goto release;
+ }
+
+ node = grab_mcs_node(node, idx);
+
+ /*
+ * Keep counts of non-zero index values:
+ */
+ lockevent_cond_inc(lock_use_node2 + idx - 1, idx);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that we increment the head node->count before initialising
+ * the actual node. If the compiler is kind enough to reorder these
+ * stores, then an IRQ could overwrite our assignments.
+ */
+ barrier();
+
+ node->locked = 0;
+ node->next = NULL;
+ pv_init_node(node);
+
+ /*
+ * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node;
+ * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we
+ * weren't watching.
+ */
+ if (queued_spin_trylock(lock))
+ goto release;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that the initialisation of @node is complete before we
+ * publish the updated tail via xchg_tail() and potentially link
+ * @node into the waitqueue via WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node) below.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+
+ /*
+ * Publish the updated tail.
+ * We have already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with
+ * pending stuff.
+ *
+ * p,*,* -> n,*,*
+ */
+ old = xchg_tail(lock, tail);
+ next = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * if there was a previous node; link it and wait until reaching the
+ * head of the waitqueue.
+ */
+ if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
+ prev = decode_tail(old, rqnodes);
+
+ /* Link @node into the waitqueue. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
+
+ pv_wait_node(node, prev);
+ arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(&node->locked);
+
+ /*
+ * While waiting for the MCS lock, the next pointer may have
+ * been set by another lock waiter. We optimistically load
+ * the next pointer & prefetch the cacheline for writing
+ * to reduce latency in the upcoming MCS unlock operation.
+ */
+ next = READ_ONCE(node->next);
+ if (next)
+ prefetchw(next);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * we're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the owner & pending to
+ * go away.
+ *
+ * *,x,y -> *,0,0
+ *
+ * this wait loop must use a load-acquire such that we match the
+ * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
+ * sequentiality; this is because the set_locked() function below
+ * does not imply a full barrier.
+ *
+ * The PV pv_wait_head_or_lock function, if active, will acquire
+ * the lock and return a non-zero value. So we have to skip the
+ * atomic_cond_read_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't
+ * been designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become
+ * _Q_SLOW_VAL. So both the set_locked() and the
+ * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() calls will be safe.
+ *
+ * If PV isn't active, 0 will be returned instead.
+ *
+ */
+ if ((val = pv_wait_head_or_lock(lock, node)))
+ goto locked;
+
+ val = atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK));
+
+locked:
+ /*
+ * claim the lock:
+ *
+ * n,0,0 -> 0,0,1 : lock, uncontended
+ * *,*,0 -> *,*,1 : lock, contended
+ *
+ * If the queue head is the only one in the queue (lock value == tail)
+ * and nobody is pending, clear the tail code and grab the lock.
+ * Otherwise, we only need to grab the lock.
+ */
+
+ /*
+ * In the PV case we might already have _Q_LOCKED_VAL set, because
+ * of lock stealing; therefore we must also allow:
+ *
+ * n,0,1 -> 0,0,1
+ *
+ * Note: at this point: (val & _Q_PENDING_MASK) == 0, because of the
+ * above wait condition, therefore any concurrent setting of
+ * PENDING will make the uncontended transition fail.
+ */
+ if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) == tail) {
+ if (atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
+ goto release; /* No contention */
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Either somebody is queued behind us or _Q_PENDING_VAL got set
+ * which will then detect the remaining tail and queue behind us
+ * ensuring we'll see a @next.
+ */
+ set_locked(lock);
+
+ /*
+ * contended path; wait for next if not observed yet, release.
+ */
+ if (!next)
+ next = smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->next, (VAL));
+
+ arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked);
+ pv_kick_node(lock, next);
+
+release:
+ trace_contention_end(lock, 0);
+
+ /*
+ * release the node
+ */
+ __this_cpu_dec(rqnodes[0].mcs.count);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+
+/*
+ * Generate the paravirt code for resilient_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath().
+ */
+#if !defined(_GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH) && defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)
+#define _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH
+
+#undef pv_enabled
+#define pv_enabled() true
+
+#undef pv_init_node
+#undef pv_wait_node
+#undef pv_kick_node
+#undef pv_wait_head_or_lock
+
+#undef resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
+#define resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath __pv_resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
+
+#include "../locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h"
+#include "rqspinlock.c"
+
+bool nopvspin;
+static __init int parse_nopvspin(char *arg)
+{
+ nopvspin = true;
+ return 0;
+}
+early_param("nopvspin", parse_nopvspin);
+#endif
projects / thirdparty / kernel / linux.git / commitdiff
