IN_MEMORY mem_status does not guarantee that the entore object is in the
memory cache. We may be just loading it from a shared memrory cache, and
loading may fail. We may have nibbled at the entry already (although that may
not be possible, not sure). The whole memory/disk store_client designation
probably needs more work, but the now-removed condition was causing
store_client.cc:445: "STORE_DISK_CLIENT == getType()" assertions.
* offset 0 in the memory object is the HTTP headers.
*/
- if (mem_status == IN_MEMORY && Config.memShared && IamWorkerProcess()) {
- // clients of an object cached in shared memory are memory clients
- return STORE_MEM_CLIENT;
- }
-
assert(mem_obj);
if (mem_obj->inmem_lo)