--- /dev/null
+From b2a3ad9ca502169fc4c11296fa20f56059c7c031 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
+Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:55:29 -0400
+Subject: cifs: silence compiler warnings showing up with gcc-4.7.0
+
+From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
+
+commit b2a3ad9ca502169fc4c11296fa20f56059c7c031 upstream.
+
+gcc-4.7.0 has started throwing these warnings when building cifs.ko.
+
+ CC [M] fs/cifs/cifssmb.o
+fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: In function ‘CIFSSMBSetCIFSACL’:
+fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:3905:9: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
+fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: In function ‘CIFSSMBSetFileInfo’:
+fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:5711:8: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
+fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: In function ‘CIFSSMBUnixSetFileInfo’:
+fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:6001:25: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
+
+This patch cleans up the code a bit by using the offsetof macro instead
+of the funky "&pSMB->hdr.Protocol" construct.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
+ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
++++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
+@@ -3473,13 +3473,12 @@ CIFSSMBSetCIFSACL(const int xid, struct
+ int rc = 0;
+ int bytes_returned = 0;
+ SET_SEC_DESC_REQ *pSMB = NULL;
+- NTRANSACT_RSP *pSMBr = NULL;
++ void *pSMBr;
+
+ setCifsAclRetry:
+- rc = smb_init(SMB_COM_NT_TRANSACT, 19, tcon, (void **) &pSMB,
+- (void **) &pSMBr);
++ rc = smb_init(SMB_COM_NT_TRANSACT, 19, tcon, (void **) &pSMB, &pSMBr);
+ if (rc)
+- return (rc);
++ return rc;
+
+ pSMB->MaxSetupCount = 0;
+ pSMB->Reserved = 0;
+@@ -3507,9 +3506,8 @@ setCifsAclRetry:
+ pSMB->AclFlags = cpu_to_le32(CIFS_ACL_DACL);
+
+ if (pntsd && acllen) {
+- memcpy((char *) &pSMBr->hdr.Protocol + data_offset,
+- (char *) pntsd,
+- acllen);
++ memcpy((char *)pSMBr + offsetof(struct smb_hdr, Protocol) +
++ data_offset, pntsd, acllen);
+ inc_rfc1001_len(pSMB, byte_count + data_count);
+ } else
+ inc_rfc1001_len(pSMB, byte_count);
+@@ -5291,7 +5289,8 @@ CIFSSMBSetFileInfo(const int xid, struct
+ param_offset = offsetof(struct smb_com_transaction2_sfi_req, Fid) - 4;
+ offset = param_offset + params;
+
+- data_offset = (char *) (&pSMB->hdr.Protocol) + offset;
++ data_offset = (char *)pSMB +
++ offsetof(struct smb_hdr, Protocol) + offset;
+
+ count = sizeof(FILE_BASIC_INFO);
+ pSMB->MaxParameterCount = cpu_to_le16(2);
+@@ -5560,7 +5559,7 @@ CIFSSMBUnixSetFileInfo(const int xid, st
+ u16 fid, u32 pid_of_opener)
+ {
+ struct smb_com_transaction2_sfi_req *pSMB = NULL;
+- FILE_UNIX_BASIC_INFO *data_offset;
++ char *data_offset;
+ int rc = 0;
+ u16 params, param_offset, offset, byte_count, count;
+
+@@ -5582,8 +5581,9 @@ CIFSSMBUnixSetFileInfo(const int xid, st
+ param_offset = offsetof(struct smb_com_transaction2_sfi_req, Fid) - 4;
+ offset = param_offset + params;
+
+- data_offset = (FILE_UNIX_BASIC_INFO *)
+- ((char *)(&pSMB->hdr.Protocol) + offset);
++ data_offset = (char *)pSMB +
++ offsetof(struct smb_hdr, Protocol) + offset;
++
+ count = sizeof(FILE_UNIX_BASIC_INFO);
+
+ pSMB->MaxParameterCount = cpu_to_le16(2);
+@@ -5605,7 +5605,7 @@ CIFSSMBUnixSetFileInfo(const int xid, st
+ inc_rfc1001_len(pSMB, byte_count);
+ pSMB->ByteCount = cpu_to_le16(byte_count);
+
+- cifs_fill_unix_set_info(data_offset, args);
++ cifs_fill_unix_set_info((FILE_UNIX_BASIC_INFO *)data_offset, args);
+
+ rc = SendReceiveNoRsp(xid, tcon->ses, (struct smb_hdr *) pSMB, 0);
+ if (rc)
--- /dev/null
+From 776164c1faac4966ab14418bb0922e1820da1d19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:12:56 +0200
+Subject: debugfs: debugfs_remove_recursive() must not rely on list_empty(d_subdirs)
+
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+
+commit 776164c1faac4966ab14418bb0922e1820da1d19 upstream.
+
+debugfs_remove_recursive() is wrong,
+
+1. it wrongly assumes that !list_empty(d_subdirs) means that this
+ dir should be removed.
+
+ This is not that bad by itself, but:
+
+2. if d_subdirs does not becomes empty after __debugfs_remove()
+ it gives up and silently fails, it doesn't even try to remove
+ other entries.
+
+ However ->d_subdirs can be non-empty because it still has the
+ already deleted !debugfs_positive() entries.
+
+3. simple_release_fs() is called even if __debugfs_remove() fails.
+
+Suppose we have
+
+ dir1/
+ dir2/
+ file2
+ file1
+
+and someone opens dir1/dir2/file2.
+
+Now, debugfs_remove_recursive(dir1/dir2) succeeds, and dir1/dir2 goes
+away.
+
+But debugfs_remove_recursive(dir1) silently fails and doesn't remove
+this directory. Because it tries to delete (the already deleted)
+dir1/dir2/file2 again and then fails due to "Avoid infinite loop"
+logic.
+
+Test-case:
+
+ #!/bin/sh
+
+ cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
+ echo 'p:probe/sigprocmask sigprocmask' >> kprobe_events
+ sleep 1000 < events/probe/sigprocmask/id &
+ echo -n >| kprobe_events
+
+ [ -d events/probe ] && echo "ERR!! failed to rm probe"
+
+And after that it is not possible to create another probe entry.
+
+With this patch debugfs_remove_recursive() skips !debugfs_positive()
+files although this is not strictly needed. The most important change
+is that it does not try to make ->d_subdirs empty, it simply scans
+the whole list(s) recursively and removes as much as possible.
+
+Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130726151256.GC19472@redhat.com
+
+Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ fs/debugfs/inode.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
+ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
++++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
+@@ -380,8 +380,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove);
+ */
+ void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
+ {
+- struct dentry *child;
+- struct dentry *parent;
++ struct dentry *child, *next, *parent;
+
+ if (!dentry)
+ return;
+@@ -391,61 +390,37 @@ void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct den
+ return;
+
+ parent = dentry;
++ down:
+ mutex_lock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
++ list_for_each_entry_safe(child, next, &parent->d_subdirs, d_u.d_child) {
++ if (!debugfs_positive(child))
++ continue;
+
+- while (1) {
+- /*
+- * When all dentries under "parent" has been removed,
+- * walk up the tree until we reach our starting point.
+- */
+- if (list_empty(&parent->d_subdirs)) {
+- mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
+- if (parent == dentry)
+- break;
+- parent = parent->d_parent;
+- mutex_lock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
+- }
+- child = list_entry(parent->d_subdirs.next, struct dentry,
+- d_u.d_child);
+- next_sibling:
+-
+- /*
+- * If "child" isn't empty, walk down the tree and
+- * remove all its descendants first.
+- */
++ /* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
+ if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ parent = child;
+- mutex_lock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
+- continue;
++ goto down;
+ }
+- __debugfs_remove(child, parent);
+- if (parent->d_subdirs.next == &child->d_u.d_child) {
+- /*
+- * Try the next sibling.
+- */
+- if (child->d_u.d_child.next != &parent->d_subdirs) {
+- child = list_entry(child->d_u.d_child.next,
+- struct dentry,
+- d_u.d_child);
+- goto next_sibling;
+- }
+-
+- /*
+- * Avoid infinite loop if we fail to remove
+- * one dentry.
+- */
+- mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
+- break;
+- }
+- simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
++ up:
++ if (!__debugfs_remove(child, parent))
++ simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
+ }
+
+- parent = dentry->d_parent;
++ mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
++ child = parent;
++ parent = parent->d_parent;
+ mutex_lock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
+- __debugfs_remove(dentry, parent);
++
++ if (child != dentry) {
++ next = list_entry(child->d_u.d_child.next, struct dentry,
++ d_u.d_child);
++ goto up;
++ }
++
++ if (!__debugfs_remove(child, parent))
++ simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
+ mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
+- simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
+ }
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_remove_recursive);
+