This another one of these ICE after error issues with the
gimplifier and a fallout from
r12-3278-g823685221de986af.
The problem here is gimplify_modify_expr does not
check if either from or to was an error operand.
This adds the check and fixes the ICE.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimplify.cc (gimplify_modify_expr): If
either *from_p or *to_p were error_operand
return early.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/redecl-23.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/redecl-24.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/redecl-25.c: New test.
location_t loc = EXPR_LOCATION (*expr_p);
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
+ if (error_operand_p (*from_p) || error_operand_p (*to_p))
+ return GS_ERROR;
+
gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (*expr_p) == MODIFY_EXPR
|| TREE_CODE (*expr_p) == INIT_EXPR);
--- /dev/null
+/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560. */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-w" } */
+void **a; /* { dg-note "" } */
+void b() { void **c = a; }
+a; /* { dg-error "" } */
--- /dev/null
+/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-w" } */
+void **a, **b; /* { dg-note "" } */
+c(){b = a;}
+a = /* { dg-error "" } */
--- /dev/null
+/* We used to ICE in the gimplifier, PR 106560 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-w" } */
+void **a; /* { dg-note "" } */
+void b() {
+ void **c;
+ c = a /* { dg-error "" } */
+}
+a; /* { dg-error "" } */