--- /dev/null
+From 05b36b04d74a517d6675bf2f90829ff1ac7e28dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
+Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:16:48 +0100
+Subject: btrfs: fix use-after-free in btrfs_encoded_read_endio()
+
+From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
+
+commit 05b36b04d74a517d6675bf2f90829ff1ac7e28dc upstream.
+
+Shinichiro reported the following use-after free that sometimes is
+happening in our CI system when running fstests' btrfs/284 on a TCMU
+runner device:
+
+ BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in lock_release+0x708/0x780
+ Read of size 8 at addr ffff888106a83f18 by task kworker/u80:6/219
+
+ CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 219 Comm: kworker/u80:6 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-kts+ #15
+ Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPi-TF, BIOS 3.3 02/21/2020
+ Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_end_bio_work [btrfs]
+ Call Trace:
+ <TASK>
+ dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0
+ ? lock_release+0x708/0x780
+ print_report+0x174/0x505
+ ? lock_release+0x708/0x780
+ ? __virt_addr_valid+0x224/0x410
+ ? lock_release+0x708/0x780
+ kasan_report+0xda/0x1b0
+ ? lock_release+0x708/0x780
+ ? __wake_up+0x44/0x60
+ lock_release+0x708/0x780
+ ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
+ ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
+ ? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110
+ _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x60
+ __wake_up+0x44/0x60
+ btrfs_encoded_read_endio+0x14b/0x190 [btrfs]
+ btrfs_check_read_bio+0x8d9/0x1360 [btrfs]
+ ? lock_release+0x1b0/0x780
+ ? trace_lock_acquire+0x12f/0x1a0
+ ? __pfx_btrfs_check_read_bio+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
+ ? process_one_work+0x7e3/0x1460
+ ? lock_acquire+0x31/0xc0
+ ? process_one_work+0x7e3/0x1460
+ process_one_work+0x85c/0x1460
+ ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
+ ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240
+ worker_thread+0x5e6/0xfc0
+ ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
+ kthread+0x2c3/0x3a0
+ ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
+ ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70
+ ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
+ ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
+ </TASK>
+
+ Allocated by task 3661:
+ kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
+ kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
+ __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0
+ btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages+0x16c/0x6d0 [btrfs]
+ send_extent_data+0xf0f/0x24a0 [btrfs]
+ process_extent+0x48a/0x1830 [btrfs]
+ changed_cb+0x178b/0x2ea0 [btrfs]
+ btrfs_ioctl_send+0x3bf9/0x5c20 [btrfs]
+ _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x117/0x330 [btrfs]
+ btrfs_ioctl+0x184a/0x60a0 [btrfs]
+ __x64_sys_ioctl+0x12e/0x1a0
+ do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180
+ entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
+
+ Freed by task 3661:
+ kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
+ kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
+ kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x70
+ __kasan_slab_free+0x4f/0x70
+ kfree+0x143/0x490
+ btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages+0x531/0x6d0 [btrfs]
+ send_extent_data+0xf0f/0x24a0 [btrfs]
+ process_extent+0x48a/0x1830 [btrfs]
+ changed_cb+0x178b/0x2ea0 [btrfs]
+ btrfs_ioctl_send+0x3bf9/0x5c20 [btrfs]
+ _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x117/0x330 [btrfs]
+ btrfs_ioctl+0x184a/0x60a0 [btrfs]
+ __x64_sys_ioctl+0x12e/0x1a0
+ do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180
+ entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
+
+ The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888106a83f00
+ which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-07-96 of size 96
+ The buggy address is located 24 bytes inside of
+ freed 96-byte region [ffff888106a83f00, ffff888106a83f60)
+
+ The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
+ page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff888106a83800 pfn:0x106a83
+ flags: 0x17ffffc0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
+ page_type: f5(slab)
+ raw: 0017ffffc0000000 ffff888100053680 ffffea0004917200 0000000000000004
+ raw: ffff888106a83800 0000000080200019 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000
+ page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
+
+ Memory state around the buggy address:
+ ffff888106a83e00: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
+ ffff888106a83e80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
+ >ffff888106a83f00: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
+ ^
+ ffff888106a83f80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
+ ffff888106a84000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+ ==================================================================
+
+Further analyzing the trace and the crash dump's vmcore file shows that
+the wake_up() call in btrfs_encoded_read_endio() is calling wake_up() on
+the wait_queue that is in the private data passed to the end_io handler.
+
+Commit 4ff47df40447 ("btrfs: move priv off stack in
+btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages()") moved 'struct
+btrfs_encoded_read_private' off the stack.
+
+Before that commit one can see a corruption of the private data when
+analyzing the vmcore after a crash:
+
+*(struct btrfs_encoded_read_private *)0xffff88815626eec8 = {
+ .wait = (wait_queue_head_t){
+ .lock = (spinlock_t){
+ .rlock = (struct raw_spinlock){
+ .raw_lock = (arch_spinlock_t){
+ .val = (atomic_t){
+ .counter = (int)-2005885696,
+ },
+ .locked = (u8)0,
+ .pending = (u8)157,
+ .locked_pending = (u16)40192,
+ .tail = (u16)34928,
+ },
+ .magic = (unsigned int)536325682,
+ .owner_cpu = (unsigned int)29,
+ .owner = (void *)__SCT__tp_func_btrfs_transaction_commit+0x0 = 0x0,
+ .dep_map = (struct lockdep_map){
+ .key = (struct lock_class_key *)0xffff8881575a3b6c,
+ .class_cache = (struct lock_class *[2]){ 0xffff8882a71985c0, 0xffffea00066f5d40 },
+ .name = (const char *)0xffff88815626f100 = "",
+ .wait_type_outer = (u8)37,
+ .wait_type_inner = (u8)178,
+ .lock_type = (u8)154,
+ },
+ },
+ .__padding = (u8 [24]){ 0, 157, 112, 136, 50, 174, 247, 31, 29 },
+ .dep_map = (struct lockdep_map){
+ .key = (struct lock_class_key *)0xffff8881575a3b6c,
+ .class_cache = (struct lock_class *[2]){ 0xffff8882a71985c0, 0xffffea00066f5d40 },
+ .name = (const char *)0xffff88815626f100 = "",
+ .wait_type_outer = (u8)37,
+ .wait_type_inner = (u8)178,
+ .lock_type = (u8)154,
+ },
+ },
+ .head = (struct list_head){
+ .next = (struct list_head *)0x112cca,
+ .prev = (struct list_head *)0x47,
+ },
+ },
+ .pending = (atomic_t){
+ .counter = (int)-1491499288,
+ },
+ .status = (blk_status_t)130,
+}
+
+Here we can see several indicators of in-memory data corruption, e.g. the
+large negative atomic values of ->pending or
+->wait->lock->rlock->raw_lock->val, as well as the bogus spinlock magic
+0x1ff7ae32 (decimal 536325682 above) instead of 0xdead4ead or the bogus
+pointer values for ->wait->head.
+
+To fix this, change atomic_dec_return() to atomic_dec_and_test() to fix the
+corruption, as atomic_dec_return() is defined as two instructions on
+x86_64, whereas atomic_dec_and_test() is defined as a single atomic
+operation. This can lead to a situation where counter value is already
+decremented but the if statement in btrfs_encoded_read_endio() is not
+completely processed, i.e. the 0 test has not completed. If another thread
+continues executing btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages() the
+atomic_dec_return() there can see an already updated ->pending counter and
+continues by freeing the private data. Continuing in the endio handler the
+test for 0 succeeds and the wait_queue is woken up, resulting in a
+use-after-free.
+
+Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
+Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
+Fixes: 1881fba89bd5 ("btrfs: add BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_READ ioctl")
+CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
+Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
+Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
+Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: Alva Lan <alvalan9@foxmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
++++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+@@ -10469,7 +10469,7 @@ static void btrfs_encoded_read_endio(str
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(priv->status, status);
+ }
+- if (!atomic_dec_return(&priv->pending))
++ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&priv->pending))
+ wake_up(&priv->wait);
+ btrfs_bio_free_csum(bbio);
+ bio_put(&bbio->bio);