--- /dev/null
+From 5838d4442bd5971687b72221736222637e03140d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:03:28 -0700
+Subject: fanotify: fix double free of pending permission events
+
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+
+commit 5838d4442bd5971687b72221736222637e03140d upstream.
+
+Commit 85816794240b ("fanotify: Fix use after free for permission
+events") introduced a double free issue for permission events which are
+pending in group's notification queue while group is being destroyed.
+These events are freed from fanotify_handle_event() but they are not
+removed from groups notification queue and thus they get freed again
+from fsnotify_flush_notify().
+
+Fix the problem by removing permission events from notification queue
+before freeing them if we skip processing access response. Also expand
+comments in fanotify_release() to explain group shutdown in detail.
+
+Fixes: 85816794240b9659e66e4d9b0df7c6e814e5f603
+Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Reported-by: Douglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com>
+Tested-by: Douglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com>
+Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchard <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 9 ++++++++-
+ fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 12 ++++++++++++
+ fs/notify/notification.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
+ include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 2 ++
+ 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
++++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+@@ -70,8 +70,15 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct
+ wait_event(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq, event->response ||
+ atomic_read(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm));
+
+- if (!event->response) /* bypass_perm set */
++ if (!event->response) { /* bypass_perm set */
++ /*
++ * Event was canceled because group is being destroyed. Remove
++ * it from group's event list because we are responsible for
++ * freeing the permission event.
++ */
++ fsnotify_remove_event(group, &event->fae.fse);
+ return 0;
++ }
+
+ /* userspace responded, convert to something usable */
+ switch (event->response) {
+--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
++++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+@@ -359,6 +359,11 @@ static int fanotify_release(struct inode
+ #ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS
+ struct fanotify_perm_event_info *event, *next;
+
++ /*
++ * There may be still new events arriving in the notification queue
++ * but since userspace cannot use fanotify fd anymore, no event can
++ * enter or leave access_list by now.
++ */
+ spin_lock(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
+
+ atomic_inc(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm);
+@@ -373,6 +378,13 @@ static int fanotify_release(struct inode
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
+
++ /*
++ * Since bypass_perm is set, newly queued events will not wait for
++ * access response. Wake up the already sleeping ones now.
++ * synchronize_srcu() in fsnotify_destroy_group() will wait for all
++ * processes sleeping in fanotify_handle_event() waiting for access
++ * response and thus also for all permission events to be freed.
++ */
+ wake_up(&group->fanotify_data.access_waitq);
+ #endif
+
+--- a/fs/notify/notification.c
++++ b/fs/notify/notification.c
+@@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_event(struct fsnot
+ /* Overflow events are per-group and we don't want to free them */
+ if (!event || event->mask == FS_Q_OVERFLOW)
+ return;
+-
++ /* If the event is still queued, we have a problem... */
++ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&event->list));
+ group->ops->free_event(event);
+ }
+
+@@ -125,6 +126,21 @@ queue:
+ }
+
+ /*
++ * Remove @event from group's notification queue. It is the responsibility of
++ * the caller to destroy the event.
++ */
++void fsnotify_remove_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
++ struct fsnotify_event *event)
++{
++ mutex_lock(&group->notification_mutex);
++ if (!list_empty(&event->list)) {
++ list_del_init(&event->list);
++ group->q_len--;
++ }
++ mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex);
++}
++
++/*
+ * Remove and return the first event from the notification list. It is the
+ * responsibility of the caller to destroy the obtained event
+ */
+--- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
++++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
+@@ -326,6 +326,8 @@ extern int fsnotify_add_notify_event(str
+ struct fsnotify_event *event,
+ int (*merge)(struct list_head *,
+ struct fsnotify_event *));
++/* Remove passed event from groups notification queue */
++extern void fsnotify_remove_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct fsnotify_event *event);
+ /* true if the group notification queue is empty */
+ extern bool fsnotify_notify_queue_is_empty(struct fsnotify_group *group);
+ /* return, but do not dequeue the first event on the notification queue */