[WHY & HOW]
num_valid_sets needs to be checked to avoid a negative index when
accessing reader_wm_sets[num_valid_sets - 1].
This fixes an OVERRUN issue reported by Coverity.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
ranges->reader_wm_sets[num_valid_sets].max_fill_clk_mhz = PP_SMU_WM_SET_RANGE_CLK_UNCONSTRAINED_MAX;
/* Modify previous watermark range to cover up to max */
- ranges->reader_wm_sets[num_valid_sets - 1].max_fill_clk_mhz = PP_SMU_WM_SET_RANGE_CLK_UNCONSTRAINED_MAX;
+ if (num_valid_sets > 0)
+ ranges->reader_wm_sets[num_valid_sets - 1].max_fill_clk_mhz = PP_SMU_WM_SET_RANGE_CLK_UNCONSTRAINED_MAX;
}
num_valid_sets++;
}