+++ /dev/null
-From 53916d5fd3c0b658de3463439dd2b7ce765072cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:48:29 +0000
-Subject: sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug
-
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-
-commit 53916d5fd3c0b658de3463439dd2b7ce765072cb upstream.
-
-Currently we check for bandwidth overflow potentially due to hotplug
-operations at the end of sched_cpu_deactivate(), after the cpu going
-offline has already been removed from scheduling, active_mask, etc.
-This can create issues for DEADLINE tasks, as there is a substantial
-race window between the start of sched_cpu_deactivate() and the moment
-we possibly decide to roll-back the operation if dl_bw_deactivate()
-returns failure in cpuset_cpu_inactive(). An example is a throttled
-task that sees its replenishment timer firing while the cpu it was
-previously running on is considered offline, but before
-dl_bw_deactivate() had a chance to say no and roll-back happened.
-
-Fix this by directly calling dl_bw_deactivate() first thing in
-sched_cpu_deactivate() and do the required calculation in the former
-function considering the cpu passed as an argument as offline already.
-
-By doing so we also simplify sched_cpu_deactivate(), as there is no need
-anymore for any kind of roll-back if we fail early.
-
-Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
-Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zzc1DfPhbvqDDIJR@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- kernel/sched/core.c | 22 +++++++---------------
- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++++++++++--
- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
-
---- a/kernel/sched/core.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
-@@ -8091,19 +8091,14 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
- cpuset_update_active_cpus();
- }
-
--static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
-+static void cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
- {
- if (!cpuhp_tasks_frozen) {
-- int ret = dl_bw_deactivate(cpu);
--
-- if (ret)
-- return ret;
- cpuset_update_active_cpus();
- } else {
- num_cpus_frozen++;
- partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
- }
-- return 0;
- }
-
- static inline void sched_smt_present_inc(int cpu)
-@@ -8165,6 +8160,11 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cp
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- int ret;
-
-+ ret = dl_bw_deactivate(cpu);
-+
-+ if (ret)
-+ return ret;
-+
- /*
- * Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
- * load balancing when not active
-@@ -8210,15 +8210,7 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cp
- return 0;
-
- sched_update_numa(cpu, false);
-- ret = cpuset_cpu_inactive(cpu);
-- if (ret) {
-- sched_smt_present_inc(cpu);
-- sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
-- balance_push_set(cpu, false);
-- set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
-- sched_update_numa(cpu, true);
-- return ret;
-- }
-+ cpuset_cpu_inactive(cpu);
- sched_domains_numa_masks_clear(cpu);
- return 0;
- }
---- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-@@ -3511,6 +3511,13 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- break;
- case dl_bw_req_deactivate:
- /*
-+ * cpu is not off yet, but we need to do the math by
-+ * considering it off already (i.e., what would happen if we
-+ * turn cpu off?).
-+ */
-+ cap -= arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
-+
-+ /*
- * cpu is going offline and NORMAL tasks will be moved away
- * from it. We can thus discount dl_server bandwidth
- * contribution as it won't need to be servicing tasks after
-@@ -3527,9 +3534,10 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- if (dl_b->total_bw - fair_server_bw > 0) {
- /*
- * Leaving at least one CPU for DEADLINE tasks seems a
-- * wise thing to do.
-+ * wise thing to do. As said above, cpu is not offline
-+ * yet, so account for that.
- */
-- if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu))
-+ if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu) - 1)
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, fair_server_bw, 0);
- else
- overflow = 1;
+++ /dev/null
-From d4742f6ed7ea6df56e381f82ba4532245fa1e561 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:28:10 +0000
-Subject: sched/deadline: Correctly account for allocated bandwidth during hotplug
-
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-
-commit d4742f6ed7ea6df56e381f82ba4532245fa1e561 upstream.
-
-For hotplug operations, DEADLINE needs to check that there is still enough
-bandwidth left after removing the CPU that is going offline. We however
-fail to do so currently.
-
-Restore the correct behavior by restructuring dl_bw_manage() a bit, so
-that overflow conditions (not enough bandwidth left) are properly
-checked. Also account for dl_server bandwidth, i.e. discount such
-bandwidth in the calculation since NORMAL tasks will be anyway moved
-away from the CPU as a result of the hotplug operation.
-
-Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
-Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114142810.794657-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
- kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
- 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
-
---- a/kernel/sched/core.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
-@@ -8094,7 +8094,7 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
- static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
- {
- if (!cpuhp_tasks_frozen) {
-- int ret = dl_bw_check_overflow(cpu);
-+ int ret = dl_bw_deactivate(cpu);
-
- if (ret)
- return ret;
---- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-@@ -3475,29 +3475,31 @@ int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const s
- }
-
- enum dl_bw_request {
-- dl_bw_req_check_overflow = 0,
-+ dl_bw_req_deactivate = 0,
- dl_bw_req_alloc,
- dl_bw_req_free
- };
-
- static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
- {
-- unsigned long flags;
-+ unsigned long flags, cap;
- struct dl_bw *dl_b;
- bool overflow = 0;
-+ u64 fair_server_bw = 0;
-
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
- dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-
-- if (req == dl_bw_req_free) {
-+ cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
-+ switch (req) {
-+ case dl_bw_req_free:
- __dl_sub(dl_b, dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(cpu));
-- } else {
-- unsigned long cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
--
-+ break;
-+ case dl_bw_req_alloc:
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, 0, dl_bw);
-
-- if (req == dl_bw_req_alloc && !overflow) {
-+ if (!overflow) {
- /*
- * We reserve space in the destination
- * root_domain, as we can't fail after this point.
-@@ -3506,6 +3508,34 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- */
- __dl_add(dl_b, dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(cpu));
- }
-+ break;
-+ case dl_bw_req_deactivate:
-+ /*
-+ * cpu is going offline and NORMAL tasks will be moved away
-+ * from it. We can thus discount dl_server bandwidth
-+ * contribution as it won't need to be servicing tasks after
-+ * the cpu is off.
-+ */
-+ if (cpu_rq(cpu)->fair_server.dl_server)
-+ fair_server_bw = cpu_rq(cpu)->fair_server.dl_bw;
-+
-+ /*
-+ * Not much to check if no DEADLINE bandwidth is present.
-+ * dl_servers we can discount, as tasks will be moved out the
-+ * offlined CPUs anyway.
-+ */
-+ if (dl_b->total_bw - fair_server_bw > 0) {
-+ /*
-+ * Leaving at least one CPU for DEADLINE tasks seems a
-+ * wise thing to do.
-+ */
-+ if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu))
-+ overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, fair_server_bw, 0);
-+ else
-+ overflow = 1;
-+ }
-+
-+ break;
- }
-
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-@@ -3514,9 +3544,9 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- return overflow ? -EBUSY : 0;
- }
-
--int dl_bw_check_overflow(int cpu)
-+int dl_bw_deactivate(int cpu)
- {
-- return dl_bw_manage(dl_bw_req_check_overflow, cpu, 0);
-+ return dl_bw_manage(dl_bw_req_deactivate, cpu, 0);
- }
-
- int dl_bw_alloc(int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
---- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
-+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
-@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ extern void __getparam_dl(struct task_st
- extern bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr);
- extern bool dl_param_changed(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr);
- extern int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const struct cpumask *cur, const struct cpumask *trial);
--extern int dl_bw_check_overflow(int cpu);
-+extern int dl_bw_deactivate(int cpu);
- extern s64 dl_scaled_delta_exec(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec);
- /*
- * SCHED_DEADLINE supports servers (nested scheduling) with the following
+++ /dev/null
-From 41d4200b7103152468552ee50998cda914102049 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:28:09 +0000
-Subject: sched/deadline: Restore dl_server bandwidth on non-destructive root domain changes
-
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-
-commit 41d4200b7103152468552ee50998cda914102049 upstream.
-
-When root domain non-destructive changes (e.g., only modifying one of
-the existing root domains while the rest is not touched) happen we still
-need to clear DEADLINE bandwidth accounting so that it's then properly
-restored, taking into account DEADLINE tasks associated to each cpuset
-(associated to each root domain). After the introduction of dl_servers,
-we fail to restore such servers contribution after non-destructive
-changes (as they are only considered on destructive changes when
-runqueues are attached to the new domains).
-
-Fix this by making sure we iterate over the dl_servers attached to
-domains that have not been destroyed and add their bandwidth
-contribution back correctly.
-
-Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
-Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114142810.794657-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
- kernel/sched/topology.c | 8 +++++---
- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
-
---- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-@@ -2975,11 +2975,22 @@ void dl_add_task_root_domain(struct task
-
- void dl_clear_root_domain(struct root_domain *rd)
- {
-- unsigned long flags;
-+ int i;
-
-- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rd->dl_bw.lock, flags);
-+ guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&rd->dl_bw.lock);
- rd->dl_bw.total_bw = 0;
-- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rd->dl_bw.lock, flags);
-+
-+ /*
-+ * dl_server bandwidth is only restored when CPUs are attached to root
-+ * domains (after domains are created or CPUs moved back to the
-+ * default root doamin).
-+ */
-+ for_each_cpu(i, rd->span) {
-+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &cpu_rq(i)->fair_server;
-+
-+ if (dl_server(dl_se) && cpu_active(i))
-+ rd->dl_bw.total_bw += dl_se->dl_bw;
-+ }
- }
-
- #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
---- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
-@@ -2721,9 +2721,11 @@ void partition_sched_domains_locked(int
-
- /*
- * This domain won't be destroyed and as such
-- * its dl_bw->total_bw needs to be cleared. It
-- * will be recomputed in function
-- * update_tasks_root_domain().
-+ * its dl_bw->total_bw needs to be cleared.
-+ * Tasks contribution will be then recomputed
-+ * in function dl_update_tasks_root_domain(),
-+ * dl_servers contribution in function
-+ * dl_restore_server_root_domain().
- */
- rd = cpu_rq(cpumask_any(doms_cur[i]))->rd;
- dl_clear_root_domain(rd);
drm-renesas-rz-du-increase-supported-resolutions.patch
netdevsim-print-human-readable-ip-address.patch
selftests-rtnetlink-update-netdevsim-ipsec-output-format.patch
-sched-deadline-restore-dl_server-bandwidth-on-non-destructive-root-domain-changes.patch
-sched-deadline-correctly-account-for-allocated-bandwidth-during-hotplug.patch
-sched-deadline-check-bandwidth-overflow-earlier-for-hotplug.patch
x86-static-call-remove-early_boot_irqs_disabled-check-to-fix-xen-pvh-dom0.patch
bpf-handle-implicit-declaration-of-function-gettid-in-bpf_iter.c.patch
selftests-bpf-fix-uprobe-consumer-test.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From 53916d5fd3c0b658de3463439dd2b7ce765072cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:48:29 +0000
-Subject: sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug
-
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-
-commit 53916d5fd3c0b658de3463439dd2b7ce765072cb upstream.
-
-Currently we check for bandwidth overflow potentially due to hotplug
-operations at the end of sched_cpu_deactivate(), after the cpu going
-offline has already been removed from scheduling, active_mask, etc.
-This can create issues for DEADLINE tasks, as there is a substantial
-race window between the start of sched_cpu_deactivate() and the moment
-we possibly decide to roll-back the operation if dl_bw_deactivate()
-returns failure in cpuset_cpu_inactive(). An example is a throttled
-task that sees its replenishment timer firing while the cpu it was
-previously running on is considered offline, but before
-dl_bw_deactivate() had a chance to say no and roll-back happened.
-
-Fix this by directly calling dl_bw_deactivate() first thing in
-sched_cpu_deactivate() and do the required calculation in the former
-function considering the cpu passed as an argument as offline already.
-
-By doing so we also simplify sched_cpu_deactivate(), as there is no need
-anymore for any kind of roll-back if we fail early.
-
-Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
-Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zzc1DfPhbvqDDIJR@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- kernel/sched/core.c | 22 +++++++---------------
- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++++++++++--
- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
-
---- a/kernel/sched/core.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
-@@ -8182,19 +8182,14 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
- cpuset_update_active_cpus();
- }
-
--static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
-+static void cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
- {
- if (!cpuhp_tasks_frozen) {
-- int ret = dl_bw_deactivate(cpu);
--
-- if (ret)
-- return ret;
- cpuset_update_active_cpus();
- } else {
- num_cpus_frozen++;
- partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
- }
-- return 0;
- }
-
- static inline void sched_smt_present_inc(int cpu)
-@@ -8256,6 +8251,11 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cp
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- int ret;
-
-+ ret = dl_bw_deactivate(cpu);
-+
-+ if (ret)
-+ return ret;
-+
- /*
- * Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
- * load balancing when not active
-@@ -8301,15 +8301,7 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cp
- return 0;
-
- sched_update_numa(cpu, false);
-- ret = cpuset_cpu_inactive(cpu);
-- if (ret) {
-- sched_smt_present_inc(cpu);
-- sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
-- balance_push_set(cpu, false);
-- set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
-- sched_update_numa(cpu, true);
-- return ret;
-- }
-+ cpuset_cpu_inactive(cpu);
- sched_domains_numa_masks_clear(cpu);
- return 0;
- }
---- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-@@ -3500,6 +3500,13 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- break;
- case dl_bw_req_deactivate:
- /*
-+ * cpu is not off yet, but we need to do the math by
-+ * considering it off already (i.e., what would happen if we
-+ * turn cpu off?).
-+ */
-+ cap -= arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
-+
-+ /*
- * cpu is going offline and NORMAL tasks will be moved away
- * from it. We can thus discount dl_server bandwidth
- * contribution as it won't need to be servicing tasks after
-@@ -3516,9 +3523,10 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- if (dl_b->total_bw - fair_server_bw > 0) {
- /*
- * Leaving at least one CPU for DEADLINE tasks seems a
-- * wise thing to do.
-+ * wise thing to do. As said above, cpu is not offline
-+ * yet, so account for that.
- */
-- if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu))
-+ if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu) - 1)
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, fair_server_bw, 0);
- else
- overflow = 1;
+++ /dev/null
-From d4742f6ed7ea6df56e381f82ba4532245fa1e561 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:28:10 +0000
-Subject: sched/deadline: Correctly account for allocated bandwidth during hotplug
-
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-
-commit d4742f6ed7ea6df56e381f82ba4532245fa1e561 upstream.
-
-For hotplug operations, DEADLINE needs to check that there is still enough
-bandwidth left after removing the CPU that is going offline. We however
-fail to do so currently.
-
-Restore the correct behavior by restructuring dl_bw_manage() a bit, so
-that overflow conditions (not enough bandwidth left) are properly
-checked. Also account for dl_server bandwidth, i.e. discount such
-bandwidth in the calculation since NORMAL tasks will be anyway moved
-away from the CPU as a result of the hotplug operation.
-
-Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
-Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114142810.794657-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
- kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
- 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
-
---- a/kernel/sched/core.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
-@@ -8185,7 +8185,7 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
- static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
- {
- if (!cpuhp_tasks_frozen) {
-- int ret = dl_bw_check_overflow(cpu);
-+ int ret = dl_bw_deactivate(cpu);
-
- if (ret)
- return ret;
---- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-@@ -3464,29 +3464,31 @@ int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const s
- }
-
- enum dl_bw_request {
-- dl_bw_req_check_overflow = 0,
-+ dl_bw_req_deactivate = 0,
- dl_bw_req_alloc,
- dl_bw_req_free
- };
-
- static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
- {
-- unsigned long flags;
-+ unsigned long flags, cap;
- struct dl_bw *dl_b;
- bool overflow = 0;
-+ u64 fair_server_bw = 0;
-
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
- dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-
-- if (req == dl_bw_req_free) {
-+ cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
-+ switch (req) {
-+ case dl_bw_req_free:
- __dl_sub(dl_b, dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(cpu));
-- } else {
-- unsigned long cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
--
-+ break;
-+ case dl_bw_req_alloc:
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, 0, dl_bw);
-
-- if (req == dl_bw_req_alloc && !overflow) {
-+ if (!overflow) {
- /*
- * We reserve space in the destination
- * root_domain, as we can't fail after this point.
-@@ -3495,6 +3497,34 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- */
- __dl_add(dl_b, dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(cpu));
- }
-+ break;
-+ case dl_bw_req_deactivate:
-+ /*
-+ * cpu is going offline and NORMAL tasks will be moved away
-+ * from it. We can thus discount dl_server bandwidth
-+ * contribution as it won't need to be servicing tasks after
-+ * the cpu is off.
-+ */
-+ if (cpu_rq(cpu)->fair_server.dl_server)
-+ fair_server_bw = cpu_rq(cpu)->fair_server.dl_bw;
-+
-+ /*
-+ * Not much to check if no DEADLINE bandwidth is present.
-+ * dl_servers we can discount, as tasks will be moved out the
-+ * offlined CPUs anyway.
-+ */
-+ if (dl_b->total_bw - fair_server_bw > 0) {
-+ /*
-+ * Leaving at least one CPU for DEADLINE tasks seems a
-+ * wise thing to do.
-+ */
-+ if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu))
-+ overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, fair_server_bw, 0);
-+ else
-+ overflow = 1;
-+ }
-+
-+ break;
- }
-
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-@@ -3503,9 +3533,9 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_reque
- return overflow ? -EBUSY : 0;
- }
-
--int dl_bw_check_overflow(int cpu)
-+int dl_bw_deactivate(int cpu)
- {
-- return dl_bw_manage(dl_bw_req_check_overflow, cpu, 0);
-+ return dl_bw_manage(dl_bw_req_deactivate, cpu, 0);
- }
-
- int dl_bw_alloc(int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
---- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
-+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
-@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ extern void __getparam_dl(struct task_st
- extern bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr);
- extern bool dl_param_changed(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr);
- extern int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const struct cpumask *cur, const struct cpumask *trial);
--extern int dl_bw_check_overflow(int cpu);
-+extern int dl_bw_deactivate(int cpu);
- extern s64 dl_scaled_delta_exec(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec);
- /*
- * SCHED_DEADLINE supports servers (nested scheduling) with the following
+++ /dev/null
-From 41d4200b7103152468552ee50998cda914102049 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:28:09 +0000
-Subject: sched/deadline: Restore dl_server bandwidth on non-destructive root domain changes
-
-From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-
-commit 41d4200b7103152468552ee50998cda914102049 upstream.
-
-When root domain non-destructive changes (e.g., only modifying one of
-the existing root domains while the rest is not touched) happen we still
-need to clear DEADLINE bandwidth accounting so that it's then properly
-restored, taking into account DEADLINE tasks associated to each cpuset
-(associated to each root domain). After the introduction of dl_servers,
-we fail to restore such servers contribution after non-destructive
-changes (as they are only considered on destructive changes when
-runqueues are attached to the new domains).
-
-Fix this by making sure we iterate over the dl_servers attached to
-domains that have not been destroyed and add their bandwidth
-contribution back correctly.
-
-Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
-Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114142810.794657-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
- kernel/sched/topology.c | 8 +++++---
- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
-
---- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
-@@ -2964,11 +2964,22 @@ void dl_add_task_root_domain(struct task
-
- void dl_clear_root_domain(struct root_domain *rd)
- {
-- unsigned long flags;
-+ int i;
-
-- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rd->dl_bw.lock, flags);
-+ guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&rd->dl_bw.lock);
- rd->dl_bw.total_bw = 0;
-- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rd->dl_bw.lock, flags);
-+
-+ /*
-+ * dl_server bandwidth is only restored when CPUs are attached to root
-+ * domains (after domains are created or CPUs moved back to the
-+ * default root doamin).
-+ */
-+ for_each_cpu(i, rd->span) {
-+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &cpu_rq(i)->fair_server;
-+
-+ if (dl_server(dl_se) && cpu_active(i))
-+ rd->dl_bw.total_bw += dl_se->dl_bw;
-+ }
- }
-
- #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
---- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
-+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
-@@ -2721,9 +2721,11 @@ void partition_sched_domains_locked(int
-
- /*
- * This domain won't be destroyed and as such
-- * its dl_bw->total_bw needs to be cleared. It
-- * will be recomputed in function
-- * update_tasks_root_domain().
-+ * its dl_bw->total_bw needs to be cleared.
-+ * Tasks contribution will be then recomputed
-+ * in function dl_update_tasks_root_domain(),
-+ * dl_servers contribution in function
-+ * dl_restore_server_root_domain().
- */
- rd = cpu_rq(cpumask_any(doms_cur[i]))->rd;
- dl_clear_root_domain(rd);
drm-zynqmp_dp-fix-integer-overflow-in-zynqmp_dp_rate_get.patch
drm-xe-tracing-fix-a-potential-tp_printk-uaf.patch
drm-renesas-rz-du-increase-supported-resolutions.patch
-sched-deadline-restore-dl_server-bandwidth-on-non-destructive-root-domain-changes.patch
-sched-deadline-correctly-account-for-allocated-bandwidth-during-hotplug.patch
-sched-deadline-check-bandwidth-overflow-earlier-for-hotplug.patch
cpufreq-amd-pstate-remove-the-goto-label-in-amd_pstate_update_limits.patch
net-ipv6-fix-dst-refleaks-in-rpl-seg6-and-ioam6-lwtunnels.patch
scsi-ufs-core-ensure-clk_gating.lock-is-used-only-after-initialization.patch