--- /dev/null
+From 914eec5e980171bc128e7e24f7a22aa1d803570e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
+Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:45:00 -0800
+Subject: ocfs2: update seq_file index in ocfs2_dlm_seq_next
+
+From: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
+
+commit 914eec5e980171bc128e7e24f7a22aa1d803570e upstream.
+
+The following INFO level message was seen:
+
+seq_file: buggy .next function ocfs2_dlm_seq_next [ocfs2] did not
+update position index
+
+Fix:
+Update *pos (so m->index) to make seq_read_iter happy though the index its
+self makes no sense to ocfs2_dlm_seq_next.
+
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241119174500.9198-1-wen.gang.wang@oracle.com
+Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
+Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
+Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
+Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
+Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
+Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
+Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
+Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
++++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
+@@ -3101,6 +3101,7 @@ static void *ocfs2_dlm_seq_next(struct s
+ struct ocfs2_lock_res *iter = v;
+ struct ocfs2_lock_res *dummy = &priv->p_iter_res;
+
++ (*pos)++;
+ spin_lock(&ocfs2_dlm_tracking_lock);
+ iter = ocfs2_dlm_next_res(iter, priv);
+ list_del_init(&dummy->l_debug_list);