KVM: arm64: selftest: Don't try to disable AArch64 support

Trying to cut the branch you are sat on is pretty dumb. And so is
trying to disable the instruction set you are executing on.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250429114117.3618800-3-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c
index 322b9d3b012559cbc08ad8b482422fb654cba08d..57708de2075df73c4bd6e4b02563cf769491ff87 100644 (file)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c
@@ -129,10 +129,10 @@ static const struct reg_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr0_el1[] = {
        REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, DIT, 0),
        REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SEL2, 0),
        REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, GIC, 0),
-       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, 0),
-       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, 0),
-       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL1, 0),
-       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL0, 0),
+       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, 1),
+       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, 1),
+       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL1, 1),
+       REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL0, 1),
        REG_FTR_END,
 };