+++ /dev/null
-From 9065bf41771c0a75a56aa041311467829ef560eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 09:49:43 +0100
-Subject: firmware: arm_ffa: Replace mutex with rwlock to avoid sleep in atomic
- context
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
-
-[ Upstream commit 9ca7a421229bbdfbe2e1e628cff5cfa782720a10 ]
-
-The current use of a mutex to protect the notifier hashtable accesses
-can lead to issues in the atomic context. It results in the below
-kernel warnings:
-
- | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:258
- | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 9, name: kworker/0:0
- | preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
- | RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
- | CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.14.0 #4
- | Workqueue: ffa_pcpu_irq_notification notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn
- | Call trace:
- | show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
- | dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90
- | dump_stack+0x18/0x24
- | __might_resched+0x114/0x170
- | __might_sleep+0x48/0x98
- | mutex_lock+0x24/0x80
- | handle_notif_callbacks+0x54/0xe0
- | notif_get_and_handle+0x40/0x88
- | generic_exec_single+0x80/0xc0
- | smp_call_function_single+0xfc/0x1a0
- | notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn+0x2c/0x38
- | process_one_work+0x14c/0x2b4
- | worker_thread+0x2e4/0x3e0
- | kthread+0x13c/0x210
- | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-
-To address this, replace the mutex with an rwlock to protect the notifier
-hashtable accesses. This ensures that read-side locking does not sleep and
-multiple readers can acquire the lock concurrently, avoiding unnecessary
-contention and potential deadlocks. Writer access remains exclusive,
-preserving correctness.
-
-This change resolves warnings from lockdep about potential sleep in
-atomic context.
-
-Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
-Reported-by: Jérôme Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
-Closes: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/7394
-Fixes: e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks")
-Message-Id: <20250528-ffa_notif_fix-v1-3-5ed7bc7f8437@arm.com>
-Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
-Tested-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
-Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
-index 33f7bdb5c86dd..134e77a646cc1 100644
---- a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
-+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c
-@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ struct ffa_drv_info {
- struct work_struct sched_recv_irq_work;
- struct xarray partition_info;
- DECLARE_HASHTABLE(notifier_hash, ilog2(FFA_MAX_NOTIFICATIONS));
-- struct mutex notify_lock; /* lock to protect notifier hashtable */
-+ rwlock_t notify_lock; /* lock to protect notifier hashtable */
- };
-
- static struct ffa_drv_info *drv_info;
-@@ -1223,19 +1223,19 @@ static int __ffa_notify_relinquish(struct ffa_device *dev, int notify_id,
- if (notify_id >= FFA_MAX_NOTIFICATIONS)
- return -EINVAL;
-
-- mutex_lock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ write_lock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-
- rc = update_notifier_cb(dev, notify_id, NULL, is_framework);
- if (rc) {
- pr_err("Could not unregister notification callback\n");
-- mutex_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ write_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
- return rc;
- }
-
- if (!is_framework)
- rc = ffa_notification_unbind(dev->vm_id, BIT(notify_id));
-
-- mutex_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ write_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-
- return rc;
- }
-@@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ static int __ffa_notify_request(struct ffa_device *dev, bool is_per_vcpu,
- else
- cb_info->cb = cb;
-
-- mutex_lock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ write_lock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-
- if (!is_framework) {
- if (is_per_vcpu)
-@@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ static int __ffa_notify_request(struct ffa_device *dev, bool is_per_vcpu,
- }
-
- out_unlock_free:
-- mutex_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ write_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
- if (rc)
- kfree(cb_info);
-
-@@ -1344,16 +1344,16 @@ static void handle_notif_callbacks(u64 bitmap, enum notify_type type)
- if (!(bitmap & 1))
- continue;
-
-- mutex_lock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ read_lock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
- cb_info = notifier_hnode_get_by_type(notify_id, type);
-- mutex_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ read_unlock(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-
- if (cb_info && cb_info->cb)
- cb_info->cb(notify_id, cb_info->cb_data);
- }
- }
-
--static void notif_get_and_handle(void *unused)
-+static void notif_get_and_handle(void *cb_data)
- {
- int rc;
- struct ffa_notify_bitmaps bitmaps;
-@@ -1800,7 +1800,7 @@ static void ffa_notifications_setup(void)
- goto cleanup;
-
- hash_init(drv_info->notifier_hash);
-- mutex_init(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-+ rwlock_init(&drv_info->notify_lock);
-
- drv_info->notif_enabled = true;
- return;
---
-2.39.5
-